Sep 28, 2015

Neoliberalization Theology

via Aryan Skynet

Benjamin Netanyahu presents Pope Francis
with a token of their shared vision
Jorge Mario Bergoglio (alias Pope Francis I) has tended to be characterized by many on the Right, this writer included, as a “Marxist” for his emphasis on “social justice” and his complicity in the Zio-globalist order agenda of flooding the West with an unending glut of Third World civilization destroyers; but is “Marxist” really the best classification for such an obviously ZOG-tolerant pontiff? Bergoglio, who worked as a nightclub bouncer during his younger, less lucrative days in Buenos Aires, was ordained as a priest in 1969 before beginning his tenure as Jesuit Provincial of Argentina in 1973. Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research, however, fills in a few important but insufficiently publicized details on a key phase in the rise to politico-clerical clout of the man who would become Pope Francis I:
Pope Francis is said to have brought “Liberation Theology into the Vatican”,  in the footsteps of Francis of Assisi.  While highlighting his commitment to peace and social justice, the Western media fail to mention that Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis I) has been a staunch supporter of  US imperial interests in Latin America for more than 30 years.
While heralded by antiwar activists as a “progressive”, Pope Francis  was one of the main supporters –within the Catholic hierarchy– of Argentina’s military dictatorship which came to power in a CIA supported coup in 1976.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio not only supported the US sponsored dictatorship, he also played a direct and complicit role in the “Dirty War” (“la guerra sucia”) in liaison with the military Junta headed by General Jorge Videla, leading to the arrest, imprisonment, torture and disappearance of progressive Catholic priests and laymen who were opposed to Argentina’s military rule. […]
One of the key appointments of the military junta (on the instructions of Wall Street) was the Minister of Economy, Jose Alfredo Martinez de Hoz, a member of Argentina’s business establishment and a close friend of David Rockefeller.
Augusto Pinochet
Augusto Pinochet

The neoliberal macro-economic policy package adopted under Martinez de Hoz was a “carbon copy” of that imposed in October 1973 in Chile by the Pinochet dictatorship under advice from the “Chicago Boys”, following the September 11, 1973 coup d’Etat and the assassination of president Salvador Allende.
Wages were immediately frozen by decree. Real purchasing power collapsed by more than 30 percent in the 3 months following the March 24, 1976 military coup. (Author’s estimates, Cordoba, Argentina, July 1976). The Argentinean population was impoverished.
Under the helm of Minister of Economy Jose Alfredo Martinez de Hoz, central bank monetary policy was largely determined by Wall Street and the IMF. The currency market was manipulated. The Peso was deliberately overvalued leading to an insurmountable external debt. The entire national economy was precipitated into bankruptcy. […]
The election of Pope Francis I has broad geopolitical implications for the entire Latin American  region.
In the 1970s, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was supportive of a US sponsored military dictatorship.
The Catholic hierarchy in Argentina supported the military government. The Junta’s program of torture, assassinations and “disappearances” of thousands of political opponents was coordinated and supported by Washington under the CIA’s “Operation Condor”.
Original
Original “Chicago Boy” Milton Friedman with President Richard Nixon and Fed Chairman Arthur F. Burns

Wall Street’s interests were sustained through Jose Alfredo Martinez de Hoz’[s] office at the Ministry of Economy.
The Catholic Church in Latin America is politically influential. It also has a grip on public opinion. This is known and understood by the architects of US foreign policy as well as US intelligence.
In Latin America, where a number of governments are now challenging US hegemony, one would expect – given Bergoglio’s track record – that the new Pontiff Francis I as leader of the Catholic Church, will play de facto, a discrete “undercover” political role on behalf of Washington.
Jorge Videla
Jorge Videla

With Jorge Bergoglio, Pope Francis I  in the Vatican – who faithfully served US interests in the heyday of General Jorge Videla and Admiral Emilio Massera – the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in Latin America can once again be effectively manipulated to undermine “progressive” (Leftist) governments, not only in Argentina (in relation to the government of Cristina Kirschner) but throughout the entire region, including Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. […]
The US State Department routinely pressures members of the United Nations Security Council with a view to influencing the vote pertaining to Security Council resolutions.
US covert operations and propaganda campaigns are routinely applied with a view to influencing national elections in different countries around the World.
Similarly, the CIA has a longstanding covert relationship with the Vatican.
Did the US government attempt to influence the outcome of the election of the new pontiff?
Firmly committed to serving US foreign policy interests in Latin America, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was Washington’s preferred candidate.
Were undercover pressures discretely exerted by Washington, within the Catholic Church, directly or indirectly, on the 115 cardinals who are members of the Vatican conclave?
If Bergoglio remains in some ways beholden to Wall Street and Washington geopolitical machinations, then his endorsement of the ongoing invasion of the West by ethnic undesirables – the vast majority of whom want nothing to do with Christianity – might make more sense in light of Tony Cartalucci’s suggestion that the “Refugee Crisis” has been deliberately engineered by western intelligence as part of its designs on Syria:
While the Western media attempts to portray the sudden influx of refugees suddenly appearing out of nowhere at Europe’s gates, the reality is that for years they have been gathering in expansive, well-funded refugee camps in Turkey. […]
In fact, Turkey has brought in over 2 million refugees with a suspiciously eager “open door” policy and has spent upward to 6 billion USD on building and maintaining these immense camps. They have done so as part of a long-standing strategy to justify creating “safe havens” in northern Syria – essentially NATO invading and occupying Syrian territory, protecting their terrorist proxies within Syria’s borders so that they can strike deeper toward Damascus and finally topple the government of President Bashar Al Assad.
Bashar Al Assad
Bashar Al Assad

US plans to carve out a “safe haven” or “buffer zone” in northern Syria stretch back as far as 2012 – before a real crisis even existed. […]
Unfortunately for US policymakers, little justification or public support underpins any of these plans to intervene more directly in Syria in pursuit of what is obviously regime change dressed up as anything but. […]
However, in hopes of solving this lack of public support, the West appears to have taken a huge number of refugees created by its years of war upon the Middle East and North Africa, and suddenly releasing them in a deluge upon Europe. […]
At the end of the day, the “refugee crisis” is yet another contrivance by the same special interests who first sought to intervene in Syria to back “freedom fighters,” then to stop the use of “WMDs,” and most recently to fight “ISIS.” Now with all three failing to justify what is otherwise naked military aggression openly pursuing regime change in Syria as a basis for wider confrontation with Iran, Russia, and even China, “refugees” are being used as human pawns to provoke fear and rage across Europe.
More frighteningly – and this is where progressives Chossudovsky and Cartalucci are unforthcoming – this unending inundation of an already subservient Europe with displaced and disagreeable Third World bodies is a guaranteed program to ensure that the continent’s Zio-vassalage remains a permanent condition, its rising tide of European nationalisms notwithstanding. This is the Judeo-capitalist’s dream – to reduce all of humanity, but especially the Aryan, into an ethnically oblivious atom, a mere economic unit and cog in the vast machinery of a globe-enveloping usury matrix.

"Hitler" as a Secularized form of "Satan"

via Alternative Right

RamZPaul blows Bill Maher out of the water after the TV comedian/political pundit applies the secular term for "Satan" to Donald Trump. Maher, a Jew, thinks that Trump should be demonized just because he opposes illegal immigration, even though the Republican contender is a strong supporter of a racially exclusive Israel, has a Jewish son-in-law, and supports continued legal immigration into America. This gives credence to the theory that many Jews, like Maher, are mono-maniacal anti-Whites who constantly shill for open borders and the reduction of Whites to minority status (and worse) in their own counties, while supporting Jewish supremacism and ethno-nationalism for Israel.

How One Woman Killed James Bond

via Alpha Game

Why the new James Bond is not James Bond:
New James Bond author Anthony Horowitz [a Jew] admitted his wife was behind the editing out of sexism in the latest novel Trigger Mortis. The writer said that remaining attractive to a modern audience, given the main character's attitude to women, was one of the hardest things to do. Horowitz said his wife went over the first draft and was 'angry' about some of the things he written.

He told the Radio Times: 'My wife Jill Green, who is the producer of Foyle's War, read the first draft and was quite angry about some of the language and some of the words I used and the descriptions.

'And she was right as she always is and I had to cut back and cut back. I had to really bring it back over the line again. Bond's whole attitude to women, although it's part of his character it doesn't really play very well these days.'
Pathetic. And the punch line is the wife. Look at that heinous half-orc. No wonder she hated the portrayal of a handsome man failing to kowtow to beautiful women, unlike her Gamma husband dutifully obeying her.

A Field Guide to SJWs: Who They Are and How to Beat Them

via American Renaissance



“SJW” stands for “social justice warrior,” which is approximately synonymous with: militant, politically correct ideologue. Or perhaps stridently leftist cultural Marxist. Or, as some of the whimsically inclined might say: noisome progtard. 
The expression sprang from the blogosphere in recent years, as a way of describing “progressive” activists and keyboard crusaders. SJWs thrive on the internet, often in obscure and fetid corners–Reddit, 4chan, tumblr.com blogs–where disturbed youngsters share their taste for Japanese anime, sexual perversity, and science fiction/fantasy. SJWs also swarm in social media. They specialize in mass Twitter attacks and in filling the comments sections of Salon and Huffington Post and the Guardian with lurid, foul-mouthed smackdowns (“Teabagger! GFY!”) of anyone who expresses an opinion that is not left-of-left-of-center. At least they did until recently. HuffPo and other sites have ramped up their comment-screening because online advertisers don’t like filth.

For an excellent dissection of the whole SJW phenomenon, there’s now a handy field guide called SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police. The pseudonymous author, Vox Day (real name: Theodore Beale) is a game designer and science-fiction writer who’s had some head-on collisions with this crowd, while acquiring a thorny reputation as the sci-fi author the leftists most love to hate. (See, for example, Jeet Heer’s treatment of him in The New Republic.) In this volume, Beale/Day not only tells us how to identify SJWs, he gives us an extensive self-defense guide explaining how to survive when SJWs attack.

SJWs

In Chapter One, “An Introduction to the Social Justice Warrior,” Mr. Beale describes what SJWs are all about:
In the universities, in the churches, in the corporations . . . free speech and free thought are under siege by a group of fanatics as self-righteous as Savonarola, as ruthless as Stalin, as ambitious as Napoleon, and as crazy as Caligula.
They are the Social Justice Warriors, the SJWs, the self-appointed thought police who have been running amok throughout the West since the dawn of the politically correct era in the 1990s. Their defining characteristics:
  • a philosophy of activism for activism’s sake
  • a dedication to rooting out behavior they deem problematic, offensive, or unacceptable in others
  • a custom of primarily identifying individuals by their sex, race, and sexual orientation
  • a hierarchy of intrinsic morality based on the identity politics of sex, race, and sexual orientation
  • a quasi religious belief in equality, diversity, and the inevitably of progress . . .
Mr. Beale also breaks down the SJW modus operandi into its stages and rationales. He analyzes some of the subtle peculiarities about SJW behavior, for example the tendency to plead grievances to weak, unprepared bystanders when they want to attack you.

Thus, when John Derbyshire wrote his famous Takimag column of April 2012 (“The Talk: Non-black Version“), the SJWs complained not to the freewheeling Taki Theodoracopulos who published the column–and who would have laughed them off–but to the sedate, limp Rich Lowry of National Review, who immediately buckled and put out a public statement that he was severing ties with Mr. Derbyshire, who had been a contributing writer to National Review Online.

Likewise, when JavaScript inventor Brendan Eich was the subject of a gay Twitter-swarm in 2014 (because six years earlier he had contributed to the anti-gay-marriage Proposition 8 in California), the homosexual activists didn’t go directly after the management of Mozilla, where CEO and co-founder Eich was widely supported by other executives. Instead, they got other companies, including OkCupid, to threaten a boycott of Mozilla’s Firefox web-browser. Meanwhile they whipped a number of low-level Mozilla employees into joining the Twitter protests, thereby giving the false impression that Mr. Eich was unpopular within his own company. According to Mr. Beale, Mozilla’s Twitter account received 47,491 messages about the CEO, “most of them negative.” Mr. Eich chose to step down just to silence the fuss.

Mr. Beale explains that this is typical of SJW tactics. They avoid hard targets and aim for the softies, the moderates, the ideologically unaffiliated:
[T]he truth is that although they certainly don’t like those they invariably label “right-wing extremists,” for the most part they leave us alone because we are impervious to their influence. Oh, they will certainly complain about us, take advantage of any tactical missteps on our part, and block us on Twitter, but they very seldom make the sort of concerted effort that one saw in the hounding of Brendan Eich or the metaphorical stoning of Dr. James Watson because they know their efforts will largely be futile . . . . Instead, they prey on the naive and the unsuspecting. They prey on the moderates, the middle-grounders, and the fence-sitters . . . [A] target who is psychologically unprepared for being attacked is much more likely to throw up his hands and run away.
While SJWs Always Lie is a highly entertaining read, I don’t want to leave the impression that it’s just a witty romp through the SJW jungle. It’s deadly serious about the damage SJWs can do to you and me as we try to get through our workday. One of their favorite venues for mischief-making is the Human Resources department, particularly in large companies that like to remind you from time to time that they have something called a Code of Conduct. This code is invariably vague, with lots of soothing phrases about commitment to equality, a “safe” workplace, and of course “diversity.” This is an open-ended invitation to all sorts of SJW mischief, which often takes the form of a whispering campaign against you, in which both accusation and accuser remain concealed from view. This has happened to the author, who eloquently describes the pit-of-the-stomach anxiety and confusion of being attacked by unseen assailants.

How to respond? Probably the most valuable part of the book is about what to do and not do if you’re attacked. Don’t apologize. Don’t resign. Fight back.
Target the enemy at every opportunity. Hit them wherever they show themselves vulnerable. Play as dirty as your conscience will permit. Undermine them, sabotage them, and discredit them. Be ruthless and show them absolutely no mercy. This is not the time for Christian forgiveness because these are people who have not repented, these are people who are trying to destroy you and are quite willing to harm your family and your children in the process. Take them down and take them out without hesitation. If you have any SJWs working under you, fire them . . . .
Mr. Beale also proposes a long-term plan for SJW-proofing our society. I found this the most intriguing part of the book. It displays a level of sociological insight and gravitas that is quite different from the light, snarky tone found in other parts of the book and promoted on the book’s cartoonish cover. The author analyzes the deep rot that the SJWs have caused our institutions, explains how we have made ourselves vulnerable to their control, and tells what we can do to end this vulnerability. His suggestions are too extensive to summarize here, but inter alia, we are enjoined to: Build alternative institutions (e.g., home school your children, create alternatives to SJW-infested Wikipedia); defund and destroy their propaganda centers (e.g., ignore their entertainment media); deny them employment; keep them out of your organizations.
It’s a bracing call-to-arms, based on an honest concept of justice:
Our ideals of Truth, Liberty, and Justice are not only sufficient, they are considerably superior to the nonsensical ideas of social justice. The ideals of social justice are not virtues, they are evils in disguise. Reject them without hesitation, reject them without apology, and reject them in their entirety.
The Kindle book is cheap but Mr. Beale has considerately made this fight-back section available for free. You can go to his website here, and download the SJW Attack Survival Guide PDF on the right.

There are other good things about SJWs Always Lie: It has a foreword and a postscript by British pinstripe-hipster journalist Milo Yiannopolous. It has apt, well-drawn cartoons by someone called “Red Meat.” My favorite is his rendition of the thing itself, the social justice warrior.

sjw

The book also explains some recent controversies I could never make heads nor tails of. Do you remember GamerGate (often hashtagged as #Gamergate)? It was a raucous debate about video games and the allegedly misogynistic lads who play them. The kerfuffle blew up around August 2014, then quickly seemed to blow away–except that people are still arguing about it.

GamerGate was too obscure for me to bother figuring out. The last video game I played and enjoyed was probably Pong, circa 1977. One of the supposed bones of contention was bias against female game developers. My first thought was that this is a good thing, and that these girls should go out more, and leave the game-boys to their nerdy male pursuits.

Vox Day makes it all comprehensible, and shows how the GamerGate saga was an archetypal SJW attack, and a good example of a successful response. It began with some personal grudges and a romance that went sour. This led to enlisting friends to promote online “news” stories claiming that the video game industry was dominated by men who put women down, particularly women trying to make video games. Vox Day and other game creators sussed out the SJW propaganda campaign right away, and retaliated with tweets and the #GamerGate hashtag.

If you look up the tale of GamerGate on the Internet, the first thing you learn is that each side accuses the other of “conspiracies,” and that the opposing camps both seem to be filled with nut-jobs. Superficially, this makes the whole thing look like a Mexican standoff, but Mr. Beale explains that it was actually a win for the GamerGaters. If they hadn’t fought back–and fought back fiercely–most of us would know only the SJW version: Gamers and game-makers are misogynistic nerd-boys, and the whole industry is hostile to women. Now, future historians will be forced to come to terms with the fact that the women being “excluded” were some of the oddest creatures in existence, who may often have lied about being harassed and persecuted. They will also learn that the attack on the game industry was a planned, coordinated media attack–very SJW. Vox Day and others exposed this, and that is a triumph.

On the other hand, Mr. Beale’s obsession with GamerGate does get long-winded, as does his tedious account of a feud with fellow sci-fi author John Scalzi and the Science Fiction Writers of America (SFWA). This sci-fi saga take up much of the opening chapter; feel free to skip it. Mr. Beale runs the publishing imprint that put out his book, so he does not appear to have had the benefit of an editor.

Also, I was annoyed by Mr. Beale’s self-description as a Native American and Mexican-American. Supposedly he had a bandit great-grandfather who rode with Pancho Villa, but photographs of Mr. Beale don’t look at all Amerindian or Mestizo. Like Elizabeth Warren, Mr. Beale likes to play the Indian card in promotional materials.

"Vox Day"
“Vox Day”
And now that I have gotten those objections out of the way, let me leave you with some wonderful quotations from what I found to be a delightful book:
“Trolling” is what SJWs call it when you respond to them in their own rhetorical language.
The perfect Queen of the SJWs–and she would be a queen, never a king–would be a mixed-race lesbian Swedish immigrant who was abused as a child by a conservative Republican white politician and kept as a sex-slave by neo-Nazis with Confederate-flag tattoos prior to writing a bestselling novel about a fictionalized version of her terrible experiences, appearing on Oprah, and starring in a science-fiction TV show popular with white nerds.
No one but an SJW has ever used more than one of the following words in a sentence: “problematic,” “offensive,” “inclusive,” “triggered,” “trigger warning,” “privilege,” “platforming,” “silencing,” “equitable,””welcoming,” “safe space,” “code of conduct,” “cisgender,” “diversity,” “vibrant”. No one but an SJW makes quasi-religious fetishes of Equality, Diversity, Tolerance, and Progress.

"Towards a Fascist Europe" by Sir Oswald Mosley

via Ur-Fascist Analytics

Sir Oswald Mosley (1896-1980),
struggledfor an Anglo-German
ententeand a unified Europe
Views may vary as to the causes of the division of Europe and the restoration of the Balance of Power, but dispute can scarcely arise concerning the re-emergence of a situation and a system which has invariably brought war. It is to the solution of this problem thus recreated that this article is addressed, and in searching for that solution we must return to the fundamental conception of European union which animated the war generation in 1918 and has been frustrated by the perversion of the League of Nations to exactly the opposite purpose that it was intended to serve. This examination, therefore, begins with an inquiry into the factors which divide the individual nations, and in particular into the factors which inhibit peaceful and friendly relations between Great Britain and other great nations.

Having established the particular of possible friendship between Great Britain and other nations we will proceed to the general idea of European union built on the firm foundation of justice and economic reality. The sequence of thought will naturally follow the story of prior disaster and will strive to show at each stage how the previous fatality can be eliminated in the system of the future. Therefore, in proceeding to build first a system of European union we shall naturally begin with Germany.

In fact, the only policy which can logically produce another explosion on the Western frontiers of Germany is the denial of expansion; not only on her Eastern frontiers but in her limited though necessary and natural colonial ambitions. Yet Financial-Democratic policy could not be more perfectly designed to promote that explosion than by the dual policy of denying Germany colonial outlet and of circumscribing her in the East by a menacing Democratic-Soviet alliance.

But the solution here suggested is not the partition of Russia, not merely because it is the first interest of Europe and should be the first objective of British policy to keep the peace, but also because the solution of the European problems in terms both economic and political is possible on the lines already indicated without any offensive action against Russia. Rather it is here my purpose to suggest Russia should be told to mind her own business and to leave Europe and Western civilization alone to manage their own affairs. We seek war and strife with no nation, but to Russia we say: ‘Hands off Europe and back to the East where you belong!’

While, therefore, Fascist Europe desires only peace, it can give reality to collective security by a new collective spirit in face of the common menace to Europe and the British Empire, which is the ceaseless intrigue of Soviet power that seeks to gain time, by negotiation and fair speech, for the destruction of Western civilization by the simple process of first dividing the advanced nations of Europe and then setting them at each other’s throats in quarrels which have neither material nor spiritual relevance to reality.

The system of Financial Democracy crumbles in decay to collapse throughout the world and the stricken and bewildered peoples search for an alternative which presents hope of peace and security. The alternative of the modern Movement rises with the stark realism of granite above the confusion of present politics not only as a rock on which humanity may build anew but as a conception illuminated by the highest ideal of national and world citizenship which has yet animated the soul of man. The realism of the new creed builds upon the basic fact of economic settlement and justice for individual nations, without which all else is vain. It recognizes that European leadership must rest with the great powers and that in material terms a Four Power Bloc of Fascist nations can guarantee not only the peace of Europe but the peace of the world once their policies are united in objectives which are susceptible of synthesis. But materialism alone is not enough, and upon the basic fact of an established community of interest the universalism of Fascism and National Socialism erects the majestic edifice of a new world idea which commands the mind and spirit of man with the fiery force of a new religion. The old world will not mingle: so the peace of mankind attends in all lands the passing of the Old World, and Britain by force of material power and potential of moral leadership becomes the ultimate arena of struggle between the Old and the New, within which the destiny of White civilization will be decided. Great is the responsibility that high fate imposes upon us. We fight not only for the salvation of the land we love; we fight also for the Peace of Mankind.

Paul-Éric Blanrue and the Jews: From Celebration to Censorship

via The Occidental Observer

Paul-Éric Blanrue
Paul-Éric Blanrue is a French writer whose most recent books have documented Jewish power networks in France, especially their relationship with the center-right under Nicolas Sarkozy and with the “far-right” Front National under the Le Pen family.[1] The thesis of these books, meticulously documented, is that Jewish influence in elite French political and cultural circles is enormous. Blanrue quotes countless French political leaders and commentators remarking upon this, but also shows how, if any are critical, they are swiftly punished.

Elite political and cultural power in France is thus distorted by Jewish perceived interests and ethnic biases, to the detriment of non-Jewish groups. The native French suffer demonization at the hands of a holocaust-centric memorial culture, the de facto exclusion of French nationalists from normal democratic politics, and the de jure censorship of indigenous European advocates, race-realists, and revisionists. Arabs and Muslims also suffer at home with a noxious combination of continued immigration and race-baiting, and abroad since at least 2007 with unconditional French support for Israel and the American Empire against the Palestinians, Libyans, and Syrians.

The story of Blanrue’s career, of his evolving relationship with the organized Jewish community, and of his difficulties publishing books on Jews is itself ironic and instructive. In 2007, he sought to publish a dictionary of anti-Semitism, with over 500 Judeo-critical statements that have been made throughout history by prominent leaders and intellectuals, entitled Le Monde contre soi (The World Against Oneself). The mainstream publisher Grasset declined to accept the book, deeming it “impossible to publish.” Grasset’s editorial chief, Jean-Paul Enthoven, wrote Blanrue in April of that year:
Dear Paul-Éric Blanrue,
I have then examined very closely, and with great interest, this Dictionary of Anti-Semitism. This is a considerable and useful work, loaded with information – but [is], in my opinion, impossible to publish. . . .
Yours, with great sympathy.
PS: Yann Moix [a journalist], who shows a venerable and faultless friendship for you, told me he would accept to preface your book. Supposing that it could one day be published, believe me when I say that I will advise him with all my strength to not fulfill such a friendly duty. This would add a useless magnetic cloud to his reputation (such as some of his enemies would like to fix it) and would complicate the release of his next novel – and neither you, nor I, can want this to happen.[2]
Thus a major publisher believed that mere association with a work documenting the history of anti-Semitism would be deeply damaging to a writer’s career and lead to informal censorship of his work.

Le Monde contre soi was later published by Les Éditions Blanche,[3] a less prestigious publishing house mainly dealing with erotic literature, which for this reason appears to benefit from an unusual degree of intellectual freedom (Blanche is also the publisher of French nationalist and anti-Judaic activist Alain Soral; see my 3-part series on Soral).

Blanrue at the B’nai B’rith book fair
Blanrue at the B’nai
B’rith Book Fair
Ironically, apparently contrary to Grasset’s fears, this dictionary of anti-Semitism proved a hit with the organized Jewish community. Indeed, Blanrue was invited by the B’nai B’rith of France (the racially-exclusive Jews-only Masonic group) to present Le Monde contre soi at their November 2007 book fair. The book indeed still features prominently in the Paris Shoah Memorial museum’s online bookstore.[4] Jewish leaders evidently thought the book served to “educate” non-Jews about the terrible hostility towards Jewish culture manifested in all times and places.

The book was republished in 2012 by Soral’s publishing house Kontre Kulture. This time however Jewish groups would have none of it, and the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA, on which see my  “The Culture of Critique in France: A review of Anne Kling’s books on Jewish influence”) sued to censor the dictionary and four historical works on Jewry (Édouard Drumont’s La France juive, Léon Bloy’s Le Salut par les juifs, and French translations of Henry Ford’s The International Jew and Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion) on grounds of “incitement of racial hatred.” Incidentally the “anti-racist” LICRA and the no-gentiles-allowed B’nai B’rith are close organizations, having shared the same president for many years.

As ever, the question of whether the work was to be promoted or suppressed was not its truth or its value as a historical document, but narrow tribal interests. The B’nai B’rith had promoted the book thinking it would stoke sympathy for Jews. The LICRA suppressed the book when it realized that such a dictionary might lead people to ask: Wait, just why has this culture attracted such consistent and acute criticism throughout the world and throughout the ages from so many of history’s greatest political leaders and intellectual geniuses? The LICRA intuitively sensed that Jewish power and privilege could surely not survive such scrutiny. As of today, the four historical works remain censored while an appellate court re-legalized Blanrue’s dictionary last February.[5]

Early in Sarkozy’s term as president and inspired by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt’s The Israel Lobby,[6] Blanrue decided to write a similar study on France. This became Sarkozy, Israël et les Juifs, a very measured and moderate book. In particular, Blanrue shows that the quarter-Jewish Sarkozy was both raised in a culturally Jewish social milieu (by his Jewish grandfather) and rose politically in such a milieu, namely as mayor of the wealthy town of Neuilly (carefully cultivating the local community’s wealthy Jews and rabbinate). He presents Sarkozy’s election as President of the Republic as a kind of replacement of vestigial Gaullist French elites, which had some concerns for independence from the United States and a balanced policy towards Israel, by significantly-Jewish neoconservative ones.

Sarkozy – now in opposition and seeking to re-election to the presidency – has made a number of shockingly Judeo-centric statements since Blanrue’s book was published, probably because he swims in these milieux and, no doubt, to pander to Jewish oligarchs. On November 25, 2014, Sarkozy told a French audience: “I will never accept that Israel’s right to security be questioned. Never. It is the struggle of my life!”[7] On June 8, 2015, he told an Israeli audience: “[the Shoah] remains an indelible stain in the consciences of humanity, and we have all contracted towards the Jewish people a debt which cannot be extinguished.”[8] As Russell Kirk might have said: Is Sarkozy running for the Élysée Palace or for the Israeli Knesset?! And yet this man was and aspires to again be the Chief of State of France! These Judeo-centric and Israelo-centric comments – and let me recall that 99 percent of the French population is made up of non-Jews – have attracted no criticism in mainstream media. Do not an admission that Israel is first in his heart (“the struggle of my life”) and an apparent reduction of humanity to eternal debt slavery (“a debt which cannot be extinguished”) make him ineligible to be President of the French Republic?

In any event, Blanrue found it very difficult to publish Sarkozy in 2009, despite the work being very cautious in its language. Even Franck Spengler, no stranger to controversy as the head of Éditions Blanche, declined to publish Sarkozy. He wrote Blanrue:
As for publication, alas the answer is no, for in addition to the risks, though moderate, of releasing this book, we will not get one line in the press and still less on television and radio, precisely because of the control of those whom we cannot name and their lackeys. And it isn’t a little splash on the Internet that will sell the book in stores. The book would not be not banned, to be sure, but the book would be given the silent treatment and have even less sales than Le Monde contre soi which, alas, did not have the success it deserved due to the silence that surrounded it.[9]
The book ended up having to be released by an obscure publisher outside of France – Belgium’s Oser Dire – and then faced difficulties even to find a distributor to enter French bookstores, requiring four months to do so. In June 2009, Blanrue hosted a press conference in Paris to promote the book. The event attracted a room-full of attendees, but only two journalists: an independent Englishwoman and Marc de Miramon of the Communist L’Humanité. Shortly after the Parisian bookstore Résistances, which had placed Sarkozy in the window display, was ransacked by thugs from the Jewish Defense League – an extremist ethnic militia banned in Israel and the United States, but which enjoys free rein in France – its computers and books destroyed, the latter by drenching them in oil. Again, there was virtually no media coverage of this equivalent of book-burning.[10]

Blanrue’s book then faced a media blackout, only being reviewed in the Tunisian, Egyptian, and Saudi media (which, I am forced to observe, testifies to the undeniably far greater degree of free speech on Jewish issues in non-Western countries generally).

One might think the book’s somewhat provocative title – which refers to an old work by the famous Jewish liberal-conservative thinker Raymond Aron[11] – might be the problem which led to the omertà. But Blanrue notes that mainstream French media had used article titles like “Obama, Israel, and the Jews” and favorably reviewed a pro-Israel book by former Israeli Ambassador to France Freddy Aytan with a suspiciously similar title.[12] The issue was not the title but rather that Blanrue’s book was critical in documenting Sarkozy’s pandering to strongly-identified, ethnocentric Jews, the prominence of many of these Jews in his government, and that this ethnic bias accounted for a sharply pro-Israeli shift in French foreign policy, to the detriment of both Palestinian rights and objective French interests.

Blanrue writes:
I am facing a de facto censorship and not an official prohibition. The method is all the more insidious: The brutal banning of my book by a ministerial order, or on the suggestion of an ethnic organization, would perhaps have provoked tens of thousands of indignant reactions, and at a minimum would have signaled my existence. . . . Some journalists were afraid . . . . Never has the Israeli question been so taboo; never has the French Republic been so closely bound up with a network dedicated to the Zionist cause.[13]
Blanrue was supported by a number of personalities[14] who had the intellectual honesty to submit Jewish racism and Israeli colonialism to the same critique that is typically reserved for Whites. Alain Gresh, of the far-left Le Monde diplomatique magazine, wrote: “This books deserves a debate, not a de facto ban.”

This however proved completely insufficient to break the wider omertà and in Blanrue’s next book, Jean-Marie, Marine et les Juifs, the writing is franker and more biting. Evidently no longer believing intellectual freedom is possible in France, Blanrue has since expatriated himself, first moving to Belgium and then to Venice, where he now lives. However, his works have enjoyed considerable visibility in French alternative media. As ever, freedom of thought on this question only exists online.

Incidentally, the novelist Yann Moix, who had been so supportive of publishing Blanrue’s dictionary of anti-Semitism and even prefaced the work, has since become a talking head on the public TV channel France 2. Moix, who had also opposed legal censorship on the Holocaust, has apparently got burned and is now terrified of association with politically-incorrect figures like Blanrue. This is the carrot and stick at work. When recently asked at a book fair about his preface to Blanrue’s book, Moix could think of no better answer than to flee the scene.[15] Human beings, being human, will typically respond to incentives, and the war on Whites and their culture is nothing if not incentivized . . .

Notes:
[1]Paul-Éric Blanrue, Sarkozy, Israël et les Juifs (Embourg, Belgium: Éditions Oser Dire, October 2009, third edition) and Jean-Marie, Marine et les Juifs (Embourg, Belgium: Éditions Oser Dire, 2014).
[2]Blanrue, Sarkozy, 6.
[3]Paul-Éric Blanrue, Le Monde contre soi: Anthologie des propos contre les juifs, le judaïsme et le sionisme (Éditions Blanche, 2007).
[4]http://librairie.memorialdelashoah.org/ficheproduit.asp?pid=17D7891C&rid=5F5E101&uid=131221183757719661892
[5]Anthologie des propos contre les juifs, le judaïsme et le sionisme à nouveau disponible sur Kontre Kulture !,” Égalité et Réconciliation, February 17, 2015. http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Anthologie-des-propos-contre-les-juifs-le-judaisme-et-le-sionisme-a-nouveau-disponible-chez-Kontre-29636.html
[6]John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux), 2007. Reviewed in Kevin B. MacDonald, “The Israel Lobby: A Case of Jewish Influence,” The Occidental Observer, 7(3), Fall 2007, 33-58. http://kevinmacdonald.net/M&WReview.pdf
[7]“Rappel : ‘La sécurité d’Israël est le combat de ma vie,’” Égalité et Réconciliation, May 31, 2015. http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Rappel-Sarkozy-La-securite-d-Israel-est-le-combat-de-ma-vie-33208.html
[8]“Sarkozy condamne l’humanité au tapin éternel,” Égalité et Réconciliation, June 12, 2015. http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Sarkozy-condamne-l-humanite-au-tapin-eternel-33434.html
[9] Blanrue, Sarkozy, 6.
[10]Diana Johnstone, “Zionist Fanatics Practice Serial Vandalism in Paris,” Counterpunch, July 6, 2009. http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/07/06/zionist-fanatics-practice-serial-vandalism-in-paris/
[11]De Gaulle, Israël et les juifs, which I discuss in Guillaume Durocher, “The Jew as Citizen: Raymond Aron & Civic Nationalism,” North American New Right, November 5, 2014. http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/11/the-jew-as-citizen-part-1/
[12]Freddy Eytan, Sarkozy, le monde juif et Israël (Éditions Alphée, 2009).
[13]Blanrue, Sarkozy, 195-6.
[14]Including the anti-Zionist Belgian university professor Jean Bricmont, the former university professor and United Nations/European Union adviser Roger Briottet, and film director Frank Barat.
[15] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl9yJfEUV2Q

Beautiful Video on European Preservation

via DavidDuke.com

Sinead McCarthy is a mother, musician, writer, doula and advocate for undisturbed birth/pregnancy, as well as for European Mankind. Below is her video on European Preservation, which is well worth a watch.

Boehner Killers

via Radix

Yesterday, The Daily Beast asked me to comment via email on John Boehner's surprise resignation. The story, modestly titled "White Supremacists Are Glad Boehner’s Leaving," features quotes from Jared Taylor, End Cultural Marxism from Twitter, and myself. 

I was asked, "There's a meme going around on Twitter that the Speaker 'served his special anti-White purpose.' What do you think?" Below is an unadulterated version of my comment.
John Boehner is really not any more “anti-White” than most every other Republican. He and his ilk are outmoded more than anything.

Boehner is a “Chamber of Commerce” Republican: he thinks in terms of pleasing big business, making budgets, cutting taxes, etc. In other words, he thinks in terms of issues that are only relevant in a prosperous, White society (America in the second half of the 20th century).

Today, the Republican Party is haunted by the specter of White dispossession and ethno-politics. This is what the Trump phenomenon is really about, and this why Trump is loathed by establishment conservatives (FOX, the GOP, the “conservative movement,” et al.) and why he appeals—on an instinctive, unconscious level—to White Americans. White Americans recognize (again, in an instinctive, unarticulated way) that taxes and budgets are meaningless in the face of White dispossession. It’s only issues of immigration and demographics that really matter. Boehner is generally weak on the immigration question. Thus, he’s lost his base of power.

That said, I’m not particularly impressed with the putatively more “conservative” Republicans who are in position to take Boehner’s place. Indeed, they seem just as much products of the past as the current Speaker.

In the end, politics is a lagging indicator of social change. And the Right of the future is just now taking shape.

Europe and the Daughter of Jairus

via Cambria Will not Yield

While he yet spake, there cometh one from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying to him, Thy daughter is dead; trouble not the Master. But when Jesus heard it, he answered him, saying, Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole. And when he came into the house, he suffered no man to go in, save Peter, and James, and John, and the father and the mother of the maiden. And all wept, and bewailed her: but he said, Weep not; she is not dead, but sleepeth. And they laughed him to scorn, knowing that she was dead. And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat. And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done. – Luke 8: 49-56

 I’m not very computer savvy, so I don’t view the internet that often. Perhaps that’s just as well, because when I do look at the samizdat publications on the internet there seems to be virtually no opposition to white genocide in the ranks of white Christians. All I see on the white nationalist front is neopagan opposition to Jews and white Christians, whom they lump together in one package marked for disposal in the dustbin of history. The neopagans are a rather hideous group of infidels; they love the white race as the feminists love women, that is, they love an impersonal conglomeration of white chromosomes while hating the white men of the past and present who have white souls. Just as Lady Macbeth screamed, “Unsex me here,” so the neopagans scream, “Unsoul me here.” It’s more than depressing, it’s the stuff of Shakespearean tragedy, to see white men who hate white people while loving white chromosomes.

The neopagan infidels are part of Liberaldom; they, like the Jews they claim to hate so much, hate Christian Europe and look to a new world dominated by their superior intelligence. They have chosen a different colored swine than the liberals, but they have chosen, like the liberals, to enter the cliff-bound swine rather than submit to Christ the Lord.

These are bitter times, unquestionably the worst of times for European Christians. The nations of Europe have raised the Islamic Crescent over Europe, and the United States has made the Negroid race, which is very compatible with Islam, the supreme ruling race of the nation. And the only opposition to the deification of the negro and the Islamization of Europe has come from white neopagans who hate all white Christian Europeans. But let’s make one thing crystal clear: The whites are being exterminated because they once were Christian. And they have no will to resist their own extermination because they are no longer Christian. You can’t become a believing Christian for practical, utilitarian reasons, but the naked truth is part of our racial history – whites did not worship negroes nor permit Muslims to invade Europe when they believed in Jesus Christ, true God and true man. When they ceased to believe in the European Christ and shifted their allegiance to the Jewish Christ, the negro-worshipping, social worker Christ, the ecumenical Christ, etc., they lost their will to defend their racial hearth fire. “If our God condemns our racial hearth fire, why should we fight for it,” became the firm belief of the new and enlightened Europeans. The demon Pope first visited the atheist Fidel Castro before coming to the United States to condemn all white European Christians, all white men and women who still love the Savior in and through their people. This new anti-Christian narrative coming out of the Christian churches is a tale told by a moral idiot, signifying the death knell of Christian Europe.

That Christian Europe should die is the will of Satan. And he certainly has marshaled a large array of troops to do his bidding – the neopagans, the Jews, the Muslims, the barbarians of color, and the liberals are all arrayed against the last remnant of Europeans. But Satan has never understood the divine love. Christ cares about His people. In this, their greatest trial, He will not leave them defenseless. Driven to extremities they will finally let go of their ‘systems’ and find God. The great satanic error of the modern church men has been their belief that they can create a system that makes a deep, heartfelt faith unnecessary. Their belief in a religious system has made, in the church men’s eyes, individual people with hearts of flesh unnecessary. All that concerns the powers that be in organized Christianity, which has become organized Jewry, is human beings in the aggregate. “If white people no longer support our system, then we’ll cater to the Mexicans, the blacks, the Orientals, or even the Moslems. What is important is that the system survives.” But the true God is not concerned with numbers and systems. He cares about what is in the human heart. What He wants is hearts that respond to His heart. So we are back to the antique Europeans again. If we respond to their vision of Christ, which is the vision of the true God, we will be united to His sacred heart. That doesn’t guarantee we will triumph in this world. When has Christ ever promised that kind of triumph? But it does mean that we will fight for those we love, because He is in our people as we are in Him: “And there reigns love and all love’s loving parts…”

The incredible hatred for the Christ-bearing people that motivates the liberal, the neopagan, and the anti-Christian church men stems from the Caiaphas principle. Caiaphas knew there was something special about Christ; quite possibly he knew He was the Son of God. But if the true King, the Messiah, had really come into the world, what would happen to Caiaphas? Would the true King smash Caiaphas’s enemies and make his position of high priest even greater? Or would Christ do nothing against Caiaphas’s enemies other than tell them that they too could inherit eternal life? Caiaphas’s anger reached a satanic white heat when he realized that Christ had not come to set up a kingdom on earth for Caiaphas and his friends, He had come to provide eternal life, something a Sadducee had no need of, because he didn’t believe in any world but this world. Thus moral pariahs, with their visions of power in this world only, always have no place for the Son of God. Christ can only appeal to those who have reached the Shakespearean depths of life. Hamlet, Lear, and Cordelia all knew what it means to have a God whose “bosom is endeared with all hearts.” The colored savages, the Jews, the Jewish-minded neopagans, the power-mad, grasping, fawning church men, and the liberals do not.

‘Tis strange indeed that our King would come to us in mean apparel and consent to be crucified between two thieves, but He did just that, because it was the only way to reach our hearts. If you ever get a chance, take a look at the movie called Strange Cargo. It is an allegorical tale of the Christ. He comes to earth in the form of a convict, and He brings a group of hardened convicts to faith and redemption through contact with His sacred heart. All save one are saved. And the one who resists the divine love? He is the intellectual. Therein is the tragedy of Western man writ large. He is too smart to let Christ come into his heart. If we look at the Europeans’ journey from faith to darkness, we can see that the Europeans lost their way sometime after World War I. No doubt that war was a manifestation of the Europeans’ new faith in systems and science over Christ. From that time on, the ‘conservatives’ ceased to write about preserving their people; instead they wrote about preserving democracy and capitalism. Great Christian works from the 19th century, such as Beside the Bonnie Brier Bush and Tom Brown’s School Days, were regarded as sentimental slop from an unscientific age, and great 20th century Christian works, such as C. S. Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia, were seen only as children’s books. But I am not impressed with the deluge of filth that the liberals call ‘modern literature,’ nor am I impressed with the scientific thinking of the neopagans. I am impressed – I am moved to tears – by the moral vision of the antique Europeans who saw beauty on the Cross and judged all things by His honor code, which was (and is) “that charity of honor.”

Like Theseus, we must face the Minotaur, only this time we enter the maze of existence as Christian warriors. Whether it is the colored barbarians, the Moslems, or the fifth columnists in the ranks of the Jews, the neopagans, or the church men, we cannot allow His people to perish from the earth without a fight. Right now the Europeans are dead men. Their leaders have already started the funeral rites. But who, when he walked this earth, brought the dead to life? There is life in the European people still if we do not give up on the European fairy tale, which tells us of a third dumb brother who became King of all the realm, because he had a heart on fire with charity.

Faith needs a local habitation. It is essential, now that Europeans have lost their geographical home, that they stay with their racial home. In that home is their past, their present, and their future. They belong with Alfred and Tell and the hearth fire Christians of old Europe. And they can stand with those men and women now, when they have no spot of ground to call their own. And the future? They have eternal Europe, which has the room their Savior has prepared for them.

We do not love white chromosomes without an animating spirit. We love our racial hearth fire, because He dwells there amongst His people. We shall always have a home so long as we see His divine love and our people as one incorporate union. We know that the white-hating, Christ-hating minions of Satan will not abate their fury. They will continue until the end of time. They will not be defeated on this earth until Christ returns. But they should not be permitted a free hand. Wherever European hearts stay connected to His sacred Heart, the Kingdom of God is present. It is within our power to make that connection, in and through our people. Nothing is written except this: “Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.”

Why Hitler Lost

via Counter-Currents

Counter-Currents Editor's Note: The following text is an excerpt from J. F. C. Fuller’s The Generalship of Alexander the Great (Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1960), pp. 308–311. The quote from Hermann Rauschning’s fraudulent book Hitler Speaks does not invalidate Fuller’s argument. The title is editorial.

The profoundest political change the First World War gave rise to, or was followed by, was a series of catastrophic revolutions: the Austro-Hungarian empire vanished, the Russian was upheaved by Marxist Communism, the Italian by Fascism, the German by National Socialism, and in many other countries throughout the world Communist and Fascist movements of various shades took root and challenged nineteenth-century civilization. This meant that while in 1914, to all intents and purposes all belligerents had been firmly united nations, whose peoples staunchly supported their respective governments, in the next war, and more particularly in those countries in which revolutionary governments were established, there would exist reactionary inner fronts, and that these hostile factions would enable an enemy, who set out to cooperate with them, to attack these governments internally. Was this change recognized by the statesmen of 1939? Except in Soviet Russia, either not at all, or only superficially. How did this come about?

Hitler’s political aim was to establish a German hegemony over Europe, and its attainment depended on the solution of two problems. The first was, how to conquer and annex the greater part of Russia in Europe, so that the Third Reich might become economically so powerful that it would dominate the rest of Europe? The second was, how to defeat Great Britain and France should they come to Russia’s support?

In character these two problems were very different. Though the inner front in Great Britain was negligible, and in France composed mainly of people opposed to war and not necessarily disloyal to their country, in Russia the position was the reverse. Most of her western provinces, notably the Ukraine and Bielorussia (White Russia), inhabited by some forty million people, had been subjugated by the Russians, and because the vast majority of their inhabitants was antagonistic to the Soviet regime, the Russian inner front was immense. In 1939, Russia was still as Theodor Mommsen, nearly 100 years earlier, had described her, “a dustbin held together by the rusty hoop of Tsardom”; fracture the hoop and the bin would fall to pieces. Hitler’s western problem was essentially military, his eastern essentially political.

Hitler set out on sound Philippian lines to establish his hegemony; he created a new model army based on mobility, and immediately before he launched his war, he tricked Stalin into a faked alliance. Next, he overran Poland in twenty-seven days, and to show his good-will towards Russia, he shared his plunder with her. Then he turned against the West, overran Denmark in one day, conquered Norway in twenty-three days, Holland in five, Belgium in eighteen, France in thirty-nine, Yugoslavia in twelve, and Greece in twenty-one. Philip could not have improved on this strategy, and had Hitler died on the day his Swastika flag was broken over the Acropolis, in the pages of history he might well have taken his place alongside the founder of the Macedonian hegemony. He lived on, but the Philippian light died within him, and that at the very moment when it was needed to illumine his Alexandrian task.

Some years before the war, in a conversation with Hermann Rauschning, Hitler is alleged to have said:
The place of artillery preparation for frontal attack by infantry in trench warfare will in future be taken by revolutionary propaganda, to break down the enemy psychologically before the armies begin to function at all . . . How to achieve the moral break-down of the enemy before the war has started — that is the problem that interests me. Whoever has experienced war at the front will want to refrain from all bloodshed. . . . We shall not shrink from the plotting of revolutions. . . . The lessons of revolutions, these are the secrets of the new strategy. I have learnt from the Bolsheviks. I do not hesitate to say so. One always learns more from one’s enemies. Do you know the doctrine of the coup d’état? Study it. Then you will know our task. . . . I have made the doctrine of revolution the basis of my policy.[1]
This was sound Philippian strategy: Subvert your enemy from within, and when it is politically possible it is both easier and more profitable than to attempt to crack his skull.

If this doctrine were true in preparing for war, it was doubly true when it was waged, and trebly true vis-à-vis Russia, because of her enormous inner front. France was down and out, and Great Britain for the time being impotent; that problem had been solved, and all that was needed to solve the other problem — how to conquer and annex the greater part of Russia in Europe — was for Hitler to put his revolutionary policy into operation. In other words, to enter into alliance with the subjugated peoples in Russia and destroy the Soviet Imperium from within, as in his day Alexander had destroyed the Persian Imperium.

He was advised to adopt this course by Dr. Alfred Rosenberg, his expert on foreign affairs, a Baltic German well acquainted with internal conditions in Russia. He pointed out to Hitler that Russia “has never been a national state, but a state of nationalities”; that the German problem was not to reconstruct the Russian empire, but to dissolve it; not to impose a new political system upon its subjugated peoples, but to recognize each nationality and foster each nation’s independence. “We should declare,” he said, “that we are not fighting the Russian people but the Bolshevik system,” and that “our fight will take place in the name of national self-determination of nations.”[2] In other words, Hitler should proclaim that his war aim was to liberate the subjugated peoples of western Russia; this was sound Alexandrian policy. But Hitler had become so intoxicated by his military successes that he abandoned all idea of relying on the revolutionary strategy he had expounded to Rauschning. He expected that Russia would collapse as France had done, in spite of the fact that the Russians had unlimited space to fall back in, as every former invader had learnt to his cost. Contemptuously he set Rosenberg’s suggestions aside, and declared that: “Our policy is to cut the gigantic cake with skill, so that it can be first mastered, secondly administered, and thirdly exploited . . . Naturally,” he said, “the vast territories have to be pacified as soon as possible; this can best be achieved by shooting everybody who shows a wry face.”[3] Instead of offering the subjugated peoples their freedom, he set out to enslave them, and should they resist, to exterminate them.

In the initial stage of the invasion the Germans were everywhere welcome by the common people as liberators; the Ukrainians looked upon Hitler as the saviour of Europe; the Bielorussians were eager to fight on the German side; whole regiments of Cossacks deserted to their enemy; and Georgians, Armenians, Turkomans, Tartars, and Usbeks, as well as Ukrainians, Bielorussians, and Cossacks, surrendered in droves. At Rostov, writes Erich Kern, “all over the city there were people waiting on the streets ready to cheer and welcome us in. . . . Never before,” writes Kern, “had I seen such a sudden transformation. Of Bolshevism, there was no more. The enemy had gone . . . wherever we went now we met laughing and waving people. . . . The Soviet Empire was creaking at the joints.”[4]

Then came Himmler and his assassins, and “by rousing the Russian people to a Napoleonic fervour,” writes Kern, “we enabled the Bolsheviks to achieve a political consolidation beyond their wildest dreams and provided their cause with the halo of a ‘patriotic war.’”[5] And Walter Görlitz writes: “The fact that the destruction of Bolshevism began soon to mean simply an effort to decimate and enslave the Slav people was the most fatal of all the flaws in the whole campaign.”[6]

More than one historian has considered that Hitler’s failure to occupy Moscow in 1941 was the turning point of the war; but the turning point lay in his policy. Had he assumed the role of a liberator instead of a butcher, the high probability is that he would have dissolved the Soviet Imperium long before the United States entered the war, and thereby have avoided the one thing he dreaded most — a full-scale war on two fronts. In spite of his military ineptitude, his crucial error was far more political than strategical: had he relied on counter-revolution instead of conquest, for him there would have been no turning point at all. He was decisively defeated, not by the Russians, but by his own stupidity.

Notes:
1. Hitler Speaks (1939), pp. 19–21.
2. Abstracted from Russian World Ambitions and World Peace, R. Ilnytzky (1953), pp. 4–12.
3. Ibid., pp. 12–15, citing Nuremberg Documents in evidence at the trial before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1945–46.
4. Dance of Death (English trans., 1948), pp. 86, 94, and 102. Kern was an N.C.O. in the Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler.
5. Ibid., p. 108.
6. The German General Staff (English trans., 1953), p. 397.

Low-Income Germans Being Evicted to Make Room for "Migrant" Invaders

via White GeNOcide Project

A few weeks ago, there was outrage when the town of Mundenheim controversially decided to evict elderly German citizens from a permanent homeless shelter.

The town’s government evicted them so they could turn their homes into a “refugee shelter”.

The mayor of the town of Nieheim, Rainer Vidal, has decided to do something similar. 

He has terminated the tenancy of Germans living in low-income housing, so that fake refugees can move in.

I know that this is an unconventional measure,said Vidal, “But we have an obligation to accommodate refugees.

This has caused quite a scandal in Nieheim because there are many empty houses available, but they are apparently not good enough for the immigrants, so Germans must be evicted from their own homes.

Bettina Halbey, is a 51 year old nurse and single parent, and has lived in her Nieheim apartment for 16 years.

Since being told that she would be evicted from her home on May 2016 to make room for immigrants, she has spoken to media telling them that there are plenty of empty houses in the town.

She said this eviction notice was “was like a kick.

Here in Nieheim there are many vacant houses. In other cities, homes are rented” she said.

When speaking about Halbey’s situation, Mayor Vidal said “I find it very unfortunate that the tenant has sought their way into the public eye. We have given a generous period of [eviction] notice until May next year. We are also willing to help her in finding accommodation.

This White Genocide agenda that anti-Whites keep pushing is the reason why some Germans are being evicted from their homes.

Under our politically correct, anti-White tyranny – White people are now “fair game”.

We can be blamed for things we never personally did; we can be called names; we can be denied a job, and we can be evicted from our homes – all because the anti-White rulers do not want White people around any more.

These are all important points, but the one thing we should be standing on is that it is genocide – this crime has been very clearly defined in court, and it’s quite clearly happening to us.

Senior Citizens in Shackles: Germany Arrests another Pensioner over “Holocaust”

via TradYouth

As the old Polish saying goes, “The Jew cries out as he strikes you.” A casual look at history will tell you that the modus operandi of the Jewish elites throughout history. Jewish banking oligarchs are currently flooding Europe with hundreds of thousands of former ISIS fighters, radical jihadists, and economic migrants looking to leech off the backs of hardworking Europeans.

This is being accomplished through the various proxy wars for Israel in the Middle East and through manipulating European politicians to cuck their nations for status and profit. You would think that the Jews would sit back and relax after their massive victories on gay marriage, getting Europeans to demographically destroy themselves, and their various other schemes but no, only total destruction of the European people is viewed as victory in the eyes of the international Jew.

The newest absurdity of the Jewish power structure is going after senior citizens accused of “war crimes” during the Second World War. The Holocaust is something that Jews will never let the West forget and they use it to whitewash Zionist war crimes in the Middle East and use the bludgeon “anti-Semite” and “Nazi” to smear nationalists who want to stop immigration or support traditional Western civilization. If the Holocaust guilt industry dies, so does the Jew’s greatest rhetorical weapon against the European people, especially the Germans.

Shoah business goes so far as to have Holocaust memorials in places that not only had nothing to do with the Holocaust. At the Statehouse in Ohio, there is a Holocaust memorial even though Ohio citizens were part of US Army units that liberated several of the work camps in the Third Reich. At the dedication for the memorial, “the Ohio Bicentennial bell was tolled 12 times for the 12 million killed” because apparently the oft-repeated six million killed number has grown a bit stale. Modern American media is always about being bigger, I guess that applies to making statistics bigger as well.

Inflation of numbers can also be found with the alleged number of camps that the Third Reich had. For decades it has been said that there were dozens of major camps and a few hundred smaller work camps but now it is being claimed by Dr. Edwin I. Megargee, a former professor at the Leftist University of California, that “the numbers kept climbing — first to 11,500, then 20,000, then 30,000, and now 42,500… . researchers have cataloged some 42,500 Nazi ghettos and camps throughout Europe.” I believe most rational people would find it hard to believe that even the highest estimates of camp numbers a few years ago have now quadrupled due to the investigation by a far-Left professor finding a huge amount of previously hidden evidence. The Holocaust industry continues to have to up the ante on numbers and atrocities in order to keep the dollars and guilt flowing.

The money that goes into the Holocaust guilt racket is obscene, especially in an age of economic downturn in Europe when veterans, pensioners and other citizens are finding it hard to provide housing, food, and other necessities for themselves. Germans alone have paid almost a hundred billion dollars to the tens of millions of “Holocaust survivors.” A report from 2012 said thatGermany’s postwar reparations program has become such a matter of fact that many Germans are not even aware that their country, after paying $89 billion in compensation mostly to Jewish victims of Nazi crimes over six decades, still meets regularly to revise and expand the guidelines for qualification.” Of course the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has a link on their website to help people claim money from the German government.

It is not only the German government which has been paying out. In 2014, the “French state-owned railway company was compelled to allocate $60 millions to American Jewish Holocaust survivors for its role in the transport of deportees to Germany. It corresponds to approximately $100,000 per survivor.” 

Even when the last Holocaust survivor dies, the Holocaust industry will never actually end. New reports that are scientifically and medically laughable are being put forward about “genetic memory” that says that Holocaust survivor trauma is passed on to their children. The Guardian reported thatGenetic changes stemming from the trauma suffered by Holocaust survivors are capable of being passed on to their children.” With this new pseudoscientific fig leaf we could face decades more of reparations and other programs to give Gentile money to Jewish hands to continue propagating the Holocaust industry.

Propaganda spent decades claiming Nazis turned Jews into soap, only to have that lie exposed in the 1990's
Propaganda spent decades claiming Nazis turned Jews into soap, only to have that lie exposed in the 1990’s

After the end of the war, the Allies gathered up camp guards, camp commanders, SS soldiers, officers, and pretty much any German they could and put them on show trial on the way to a quick execution. The Allies had already decided to do a mass purge after the war of German officers, intelligentsia, and community leaders, regardless of their guilt.

Given that the official Holocaust narrative tells us the Allies had no idea about what was going on until they strolled into the camps, it is strange that at the Tripartite Dinner Meeting at the Tehran Conference, the Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, proposed executing “50,000-100,000 German staff officers” as a way to punish and crush Germany. With no reason given at the meeting for the mass executions other than trying to decapitate German society, it is clear that the Allies were not interested in justice, only blood revenge.

One of the Soviet justices Iola T. Nikitchenko said before any Nuremberg testimony or evidence had been entered that “The fact that the Nazi leaders are criminals has already been established. The task of the Tribunal is only to determine the measure of guilt of each particular person and mete out the necessary punishment — the sentences.” English common law and the foundation of all Western judicial practices has asserted that one is innocent until proven guilty. It’s without a doubt that the Nuremberg justices were made up of hanging judges, not ones interested in truly evaluating the evidence and alleged guilt of the accused.

Soviet authorities of course never faced justice for the Katyn Massacre where even our own Central Intelligence Agency admits,
“The victims were Polish officers, soldiers, and civilians captured by the Red Army after it invaded eastern Poland in September 1939. Strictly speaking, even the Polish servicemen were not POWs. The USSR had not declared war… Those who died at Katyn included an admiral, two generals, 24 colonels, 79 lieutenant colonels, 258 majors, 654 captains, 17 naval captains, 3,420 NCOs, seven chaplains, three landowners, a prince, 43 officials, 85 privates, and 131 refugees. Also among the dead were 20 university professors; 300 physicians; several hundred lawyers, engineers, and teachers; and more than 100 writers and journalists as well as about 200 pilots.”
The Soviet Union purposefully massacred thousands of innocent people for the purpose of destroying Polish resistance to Soviet occupation and yet were able to sit in judgment of Germans for their supposed war crimes. The crimes of the Allies were brushed under the rug, even when civilians were massacred en masse but the crimes of the Third Reich–real and imagined–were put before the world.

Estimates for the Soviet Union alone puts organized murder of over twenty million people in the time from the Bolshevik Revolution to the Second World War. The Holodomor was a man-made famine done by Jewish Bolshevik authorities and Joseph Stalin to kill up to seven million Ukrainian men, women, and children. While the Holocaust is taught to every schoolchild in the Western world, the atrocities of the Soviet Union have been all but forgotten, except for the millions of family members of victims who still carry the pain of their loss.

German civilians attempting to bury the dead after the firebombing of Dresden
German civilians attempting to bury the dead after the firebombing of Dresden

The firebombing of Dresden is another example of systematic mass murder of civilians done by the Allies that in any sane world would have resulted in international prosecution. The city of Dresden was an evacuation point for German civilians fleeing the bombing of German cities and was full of the elderly, women, and children when the fire bombs were dropped. The bombings were,
“[…] a series of Allied firebombing raids begins against the German city of Dresden, reducing the ‘Florence of the Elbe’ to rubble and flames, and killing as many as 135,000 people. It was the single most destructive bombing of the war—including Hiroshima and Nagasaki—and all the more horrendous because little, if anything, was accomplished strategically, since the Germans were already on the verge of surrender.”
Even Leftist professor Gregory Stanton said “the Allies’ firebombing of Dresden and nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also war crimes – and as Leo Kuper and Eric Markusen have argued, also acts of genocide.”

Regardless of your view of the National Socialists, even very basic research shows that in any fair judicial system most of the post-War trials would have been called mistrials due to witnesses being tortured or coerced into giving testimony, tactics against the Geneva Convention were used against prisoners of war, and the court offering deals to men to give outlandish testimony in return for reduced sentences or their freedom muddies any testimony given in court.

Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Harlan Fiske Stone an avowed anti-Nazi and American patriot said “Chief U.S. prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old fashioned ideas.”

Charles F. Wennerstrum, an Iowa Supreme Court justice who served as presiding judge in the Nuremberg trial of German generals left the trials stating that he left “with a feeling that justice has been denied.” It is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the Nuremberg trials were Soviet-style show trials. Auschwitz camp commandant Rudolf Höss was forced to sign a confession in English, a language that he did not speak or read, after extended amounts of torture.

Jewish soldiers of the 92nd Field Security Section were guilty of torturing Höss as proven by memoirs of one of the soldiers called Legions of Death, that stated “The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: ‘Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.”

It took three days of sleep deprivation, beatings, forcing the prisoner to stand in the frigid cold nearly naked for extended periods, and other forms of torture to crack the mind of Commandant Höss into signing a confession, in English, of his supposed crimes. The Cornell University Law School found thatPolice-induced false confessions are among the leading causes of wrongful convictions

After it was released that detainees at Guantanamo Bay were tortured, a CIA investigation found “the use of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information or gaining detainee cooperation.” If torture is ineffective today in getting accurate statements from prisoners and in many cases had the detainees lie in order to stop torture, why would we believe that torture was effective after the Second World War.

Psychologists found Rudolf Höss to be a psychological wreck until his execution, proof that the abuse he was given as a prisoner likely worked towards him giving a false confession. Höss confessed to killing ten thousand Jews a day as Commandant of Auschwitz which given just over 1,400 days between 1941 and 1945 that would mean one camp alone killed over 14,000,000 people. Even if those numbers were drastically reduced that would mean that every person alleged to be killed in the Holocaust would have been killed at Auschwitz alone.

Höss’s confession stated that under his direct supervision two million Jews were killed at his single camp, a number that today is discounted by the United States Holocaust Memorial museum that says that between 1939 and 1945 “the camp authorities murdered approximately 1.1 million” at Auschwitz. How then if the official Jewish resources on the subject of the Holocaust say that Rudolf Höss lied in his confession by nearly doubling the amount of dead at the camp during its entire time of operation, Rudolf Höss was one of three separate commandants of Auschwitz, can we seriously believe that his confession was legitimate?

A sign at Auschwitz that was removed in 1990 and replaced with one that said "One and a half million died." The six million number remained the same
A sign at Auschwitz that was removed in 1990 and replaced with one that said “One and a half million died.” The six million overall Holocaust death toll number remained the same

Given all of the ample resources to suggest that many of the convictions and confessions about the Holocaust are in question, why is Germany spending its time and money on hunting down senior citizens for their alleged crimes? Organized Jewish power is pulling the strings on the German government, pure and simple. In order to drum up more sympathy for the Jewish people and to attack nationalism, the European governments are cracking down on supposedly dangerous clerks, accountants, secretaries, janitors, and any German who happened to pass through concentration and work camp gates.

Last year Germany charged Oskar Groening, a 93 year old former accountant at Auschwitz, withwith 300,000 counts of accessory to murder for serving as a guard at Auschwitz.” The crimes he was accused of were being in charging of “collecting and tally money stolen from inmates” and assisting “in removing the luggage of victims.” This is a man who was a teenager at the time and was in charge of counting money and moving things from train cars to processing centers, he is not being accused of shooting, stabbing or gassing anyone, but because he was a German during World War Two, even one doing a menial job, the Jewish elites and their German government puppets believe he should spend the rest of his life behind bars.

Later in 2014 the German government arrested three elderly men accused of working at a concentration camp who “were aged 88, 92 and 94 and lived in the south-western state of Baden-Württemberg, said prosecutors in the city of Stuttgart… Further home raids were carried out at three more locations in the state, as well as at other homes in the western states of Hesse and North Rhine-Westphalia…The German office investigating Nazi war crimes last year sent files on 30 former Auschwitz personnel to state prosecutors with a recommendation to bring charges against them.”

Now just this past week German authorities have arrested a “A 91-year-old woman has been charged with 260,000 counts of accessory to murder on allegations she was a member of the Nazi SS who served in Auschwitz.. the woman is alleged to have served as a radio operator for the camp commandant.” She is being charged with 260,000 counts of accessory to murder because “she helped the death camp function.” This means that in the German governments eyes anyone who pushed a broom, delivered milk to the cafeteria or did anything to make the camp function is guilty of crimes that should land them in prison until the day they die.

German society, flagellating itself for 70 years and counting
German society, flagellating
itself for 70 years and counting
The German government is reaching record levels of hysteria to attempt to continue Soviet style show trials for senior citizens who have been law abiding citizens for over seventy years. Government authorities are rounding up people who were barely older than children at the time of the war, shown by the fact that in this newest case the woman will be tried as a minor because she was under 21 when her crimes were allegedly committed.
As part of show trials, an important portion is not just condemning and convicting the accused, but breaking them mentally so that they beg for mercy in front of the public and apologize for what they are accused of committing, whether they did or not. German politics has become a level of self flagellation that would impress a 13th century Catholic monk.

The only way for Germany and all of Europe to fully heal from the brothers wars of 1914-1918 and 1939-1945 is to put the past behind us. As long as our enemies can guilt us and make us subservient to their will we will continue to lose the battle for Faith, family and folk. I believe that as long as we are dragging senior citizens out of their homes to send them into a gulag for the crime of counting luggage or mopping a floor seventy years ago we will not have the ability to resist the influence of globalism, modernity and multiculturalism.

To the question about if I am a “Holocaust denier” or other such buzz words the fact is I am interested in the evidence from a historical perspective, but beyond that I really don’t care. Horrible things happen in war, it has been that way for thousands of years. We as Europeans must not be trapped looking back seventy years and arguing, the situation is too dire for that.

Europeans must look forward to the rest of the 21st and the upcoming 22nd century and decide if we are going to accept demographic and cultural displacement. Even if six million Jews were gassed, which evidence suggests they weren’t, that still doesn’t mean that Europeans have to accept genocide for ourselves and the extinction of our culture. Our people, just like every other people has a right to exist in our nations, no matter what happened historically.

The European Union has become a full tool of the globalist elites and has no respect for Identity, sovereignty or the people, as shown by their blatant disrespect towards the elderly in these recent cases. Only a healthy and organic nationalism can honor our history, discover the truth about the past but also pave the way for a future for the European folk. I am not concerned about where we were, instead I am concerned about where we as a people are going.