The opening crawl of the first Star Wars film begins with the line, “A long time ago, in a galaxy far away…,” rooting the franchise in a fundamentally traditionalist, perennial, and cyclical perspective of history, in contrast with the Star Trek franchise which was rooted in the merchant’s progressivist mythos. Contrary to popular belief, there’s nothing intrinsically “progressive,” “modern,” or “futuristic” about technology in and of itself. Throughout history, technology has advanced, receded, shifted focus, and undergone unexpected paradigm shifts; all of which contradict the Mercantile mythos of technology as something gifted to us by the Enlightenment in opposition to throne and altar.
Religious institutions have played a key role throughout history of preserving knowledge, cultivating scientific inquiry, and investing in technological progress. Regretfully, just as many admirers of the 20th century’s National Socialists often end up admiring and endorsing much of the exaggerations and lies about them peddled by the Allied post-war propagandists, many Radical Traditionalists and Medievalists mistakenly defend and romanticize the false “Dark Age” narrative of a Western Civilization which resisted and opposed worldly knowledge, scientific inquiry, and technological progress.
These misguided Medievalists are also victims of post-war propaganda, with the war being the French Revolution and its sister revolutions throughout Europe and North America against any and all aristocratic and ecclesiastical authority. The New Right is trapped in a false frame, one which blinds our movement to the direction things are rapidly heading. We are heading into a Techno-Traditionalist future where technological progress becomes not merely helpful but fully central to defeating the Jewish oligarchs, their multinational corporate capitalist lackeys, their metapolitical worldview, and their geopolitical world order.
Russia is currently at the center of the nascent development of a Traditionalist dipole against the forces of Modernity based in the West and Israel. A wonderful thing about global mega-trends is that they’re much bigger than the individuals and organizations involved. One needn’t lose sleep over Alexander Dugin’s contradictions and inconsistencies, because he’s riding a wave which he neither created nor can he direct. Dugin’s closer than any other prominent geopolitical theoretician to the truth because he relies on an experimental approach to ideology, and is steadily drifting more and more towards a Traditionalism vs. Modernity framing of his metapolitics with each iterative experiment.
All Putin, Dugin, the Iranians, the Chinese, or any other historical actors can decide is which side of this historical process they wish to be on; the emergent forces of tribe and tradition or the waning forces of finance capital and neo-colonialism. The Russians aren’t destined to rule the 21st Century because of geography. The Chinese aren’t destined to dominate the 21st Century because it’s “their turn.” Every nation’s leaders can and should be expected to be biased and to push a self-promoting narrative, but no man or institution should ever be fully trusted as a stand-in for the perennial Radical Traditionalist precepts which are gathering strength.
Not Putin. Not Dugin. Not Assad. Not Trump. Not Coulter. Not Cruz. Measure every man (and woman) according to the permanent metric of tribal sovereignty, noble hierarchy, loving stewardship, fidelity, and faith. All of those aforementioned historical actors are, to varying degrees and in varying ways, reflecting and projecting challenges to the globalist oligarchs, but we’re loyal to an abstract ideal, not a party, a movement, an institution, or a man. Conversely, we shouldn’t allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good, and should be right in the middle of all the restorationary projects and processes bubbling up all around us. We should promote the good, reject the bad, and cleverly exploit the opportunities as they’re presented.
If Vladimir Putin leads us in circles, if Donald Trump drops the ball, then new leaders will emerge in their place. The Mercantile Age is exhausting itself, and individuals and institutions are gradually and organically arriving at challenges to Modernity, and–most importantly–technological advancement is weakening the oligarchs’ leveraged means of institutional power projection.
Nearly all American ideologues have been immersed so deeply in the Mercantile Age that they can’t even grasp how the world could or would operate when money’s no longer the cardinal means of power projection. Generally, they assume “anarchy,” more appropriately understood as “chaos” would prevail in a post-corporate world. What will reign after the Mercantile Age is exactly what reigned before the Mercantile Age: throne and altar; tribe and tradition; faith, family, and folk. While empires, alliances, and unsustainable artificial systems of control rise and wane from age to age, the traditional families, the ethnic tribes, and the traditional faiths eternally recur.
I would seem an unlikely supporter of Julian Assange and the Anonymous hacking community. I have, after all, been charged with cleaning up after one of Assange’s doxxing operations and sites I administer are regularly targeted by anti-White hacktivists who operate under the nebulous “Anonymous” banner. In fact, there’s an elaborate campaign going on right now to censor our activism. I’ll win, both because I’ve got mad skills and because the game is rigged in my favor.
Technology is integrally on the side of free expression, which is integrally on the side of the truth, which is integrally on our side, …because we’re right. Even if they take down my host provider, the site will spring back up elsewhere within hours. Even if Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian manage to convince Google, the Internet backbone providers, and the United Nations to ban our speech as “hate speech,” we’ll bubble back up on a Tor node on the darknet within hours. Even if they shut down our bank accounts and achieve a European-style banning of our group as a “hate group,” there are technological solutions to that problem, too.
Back in 2011, Assange met with Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt in the English country cottage where Assange was on house arrest.
They outlined radically opposing perspectives: for Assange, the liberating power of the Internet is based on its freedom and statelessness. For Schmidt, emancipation is at one with U.S. foreign policy objectives and is driven by connecting non-Western countries to Western companies and markets. These differences embodied a tug-of-war over the Internet’s future that has only gathered force subsequently.In the 2014 Newsweek article, Assange offers us a brief glimpse into the conspiratorial network of corporations, secret organizations, Jewish power brokers, and quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations (QUANGOs) which drive and steer the Atlanticist power structure.
The stated reason for the visit was a book. Schmidt was penning a treatise with Jared Cohen, the director of Google Ideas, an outfit that describes itself as Google’s in-house “think/do tank.”
I knew little else about Cohen at the time. In fact, Cohen had moved to Google from the U.S. State Department in 2010. He had been a fast-talking “Generation Y” ideas man at State under two U.S. administrations, a courtier from the world of policy think tanks and institutes, poached in his early twenties.
He became a senior advisor for Secretaries of State Rice and Clinton. At State, on the Policy Planning Staff, Cohen was soon christened “Condi’s party-starter,” channeling buzzwords from Silicon Valley into U.S. policy circles and producing delightful rhetorical concoctions such as “Public Diplomacy 2.0.” On his Council on Foreign Relations adjunct staff page he listed his expertise as “terrorism; radicalization; impact of connection technologies on 21st century statecraft; Iran.”
It was Cohen who, while he was still at the Department of State, was said to have emailed Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to delay scheduled maintenance in order to assist the aborted 2009 uprising in Iran. His documented love affair with Google began the same year when he befriended Eric Schmidt as they together surveyed the post-occupation wreckage of Baghdad. Just months later, Schmidt re-created Cohen’s natural habitat within Google itself by engineering a “think/do tank” based in New York and appointing Cohen as its head. Google Ideas was born.Within a few short paragraphs, so much emerges. We have Jewish agents pulling the strings of the “color revolutions” and “Arab Springs” in the Islamic World. We have the multinational corporations answering to and investing in these projects. The whole incestuous world of Jewish Power, multinational corporate greed, and federal government power all coordinated and synchronized behind their shared vision of a borderless, greed-driven, Jewish-dominated secular atheist global marketplace.
Google Ideas recently made the news by entrusting Zoe Quinn, the maniacal slut who’s been campaigning against the technology industry’s alleged “misogyny,” to speak before the United Nations on the menace of “cyberbullying.” Supposedly, and I’m trying to be objective, “cyberbullying” is not only inclusive of personally harassing private people in their private lives, but is also inclusive of any and all pointed political disagreement with liberals.
It’s boggling to imagine Zoe Quinn speaking before the United Nations about how hostile reactions to her aggressive political campaign to silence and censor technologists have hurt her feelings and must be censored. A storied international organization which has violent genocides, horrific war crimes, grinding refugee crises, and godawful famines to deal with stopped what it was doing and gave the floor to an Internet troll who insists that the people responding to her trolling must be censored and prosecuted by literally the whole big wide world.
The whole thing would be comical if this bipolar bimbo weren’t the avatar of a vast sinister conspiracy by the multinational corporations to rein in the Internet and ratchet down the flow of information back to where things were in the eighties, when the multinational corporations and their Jewish overlords had a complete monopoly on the transmission and spin on global information and communication. But then it all turns comical again when one realizes that Zoe Quinn has the entire matrix of multinational corporations behind her, the full weight and force of world government on her side, President Obama firmly in her camp, the United States military beholden to her radical feminist agenda, …and yet the Internet is still roasting her silly ass!
We must shake off our antiquarian prejudices and recognize that technological progress is central to the struggle for the twin identitarian and traditionalist causes. We were all led to believe by this regime’s “experts” that the Internet would be a powerful tool for “progress” and Modernity, but on balance it’s proven to be the opposite. The Internet has empowered traditional families to more effectively and efficiently homeschool their children. The Internet has made it devilishly difficult for the elites to pull off their propaganda campaigns both at home and abroad. The Internet has made it impossible to conceal their crimes or silence their opponents.
In the next stage, crypto-currency technology will strike at the very heart of the financial systems they rely on for their power projection. Dissident projects like our own and related projects will reach a stage of development, complexity, and resource acquisition where we’ll be capable of real world power projection. All of the disparate movements for identity, tradition, faith, family, and folk the world over will begin building relationships and alliances in opposition to the oligarchs, recognizing that we all belong to a Traditionalist International in a common struggle for humanity against corporate greed and Zionist machinations.
And when we’re all united around the perennial and transcendent truths that unite all of humanity against the dehumanizing forces of Modernity, all of the capitalist oligarchs, Zionist warmongers, and their countless apparatchiks will look every bit as pathetic, silly, and vulnerable as Zoe Quinn looked yesterday when she spoke before the United Nations on behalf of Google Ideas.