Just as Internet pornography misdirects and warps the male mind away from the behavioral patterns intended by God and nature, cloying media campaigns calling for us to take pity on and offer charity for this or that victim almost always misdirect and warp the feminine (and feminized) mind toward serving some calculated political agenda. Whether it’s Ahmed’s dad crafting a scary looking clock to push his Islamic immigrant agenda, the media zooming in on drowned migrant babies to push their European immivasion agenda, or Leftists framing violent criminals as hapless victims of police brutality who dindu nuffin to serve their #BlackLivesMatter agenda, it’s probably bullshit.
If it involves both pity and a hashtag, you’re being cuckolded. Some political faction, somewhere, is scheming to redirect your altruistic instincts from your family, neighbors, parishioners, and friends to drive their carefully calculated agenda. Jack Donovan’s breakthrough essay, I Don’t Care, explains it all very well. In summary, giving a damn is a finite and precious resource to be jealously guarded and thoughtfully distributed in a generally localized and directly accountable manner.
I object to the general consensus emerging in the New Right that pathological altruism is the primary driver of our dispossession. Pathological altruism is a real problem, but it’s not the problem with White countries. If sincere altruism were a major problem, then it would exist more commonly in sustained forms. Very few people anonymously and consistently donate to those Sally Struthers commercial projects to send $1 per day to an African villager. Third world aid isn’t a popular talking point on the campaign trail, and it’s understood both in theory and in practice that the vast majority of “foreign aid” is encrypted bribery of poverty-stricken nations to serve our geopolitical agenda.
The only altruism which is prominent is the vacuous signaling type. Whites aren’t herding to Big Brother programs to mentor and support Black youth in response to the public outcry over police brutality. They’re tweeting #BlackLivesMatter and doing absolutely nothing else. Even the ones who are more aggressively signaling are doing so in a manner carefully calibrated to increase their social status. At the cost of adopting and caring for a Black orphan, one could make a world of difference for the Black orphan and his entire village back home. But that’s not a common or popular thing to do, because it’s really all about status, not altruism.
To actually adopt a Black child? Sure, it does nothing to improve global poverty, but it sends a glass-shattering signal to everybody in a twenty mile radius that you’re a White Savior.
Altruism is an active state of genuine care, not a posture, position, or tweet. Not only does George Bush not actually care about Black people, none of the rest of us do, either, Kanye. There’s only so much “care” to go around, guy. And don’t pretend you care all that much about White people. Let’s all stop posturing for a moment. You wouldn’t know it from listening to modern people talking or listening to the mainstream media, but the overwhelming majority of Americans, White and Black alike, don’t actually care about much of anybody or anything outside of their own private world of family and friends. And given Modern alienation, even that pool’s pretty much drained.
The root of our dispossession doesn’t lie in our Pathological Altruism. It lies in White Saviorism, which is the neo-colonial compliment to paleo-colonial White Supremacism. Whites, being the most aggressive and masculinized of the races which have had the opportunity to dominate other races, have the strongest compulsion to do so. Sure, the Chinese want a stake in African resources and are muscling their way into the neo-colonial game. But they’re capable of doing so without this awkward and grandiose internal struggle over how to relate with the locals.
The Chinese just do their business, bribe who they need to bribe, keep out of local affairs, and carry on with the business of exploitation. It’s a much more dignified, honorable, and straightforward arrangement that the Global South actually prefers over our incessant mind games and manipulations. Just ask Mugabe.
In the past, this impulse of ours manifested in the straightforward manner of colonial domination, imperialism, slavery, and dominant/submissive caste societies. As economic and geopolitical realities rendered that means of minion-mongering unsustainable, we Whites were driven to encrypt our will to power and domination in the language of altruism and dependence.
What we originally had with the Global South was a simple dominant and submissive relationship. With White Saviorism (White Supremacism 2.0), we have evolved towards a complex but still dominant and submissive relationship. Women who’ve been in abusive relationships are fully aware of how an aggressive and controlling man can and will frame his domination in the language of altruism, caring, and sacrifice. Our neo-colonial relationship with the Global South is no different. We need them to need us, and the last thing the White Savior wants is for minorities to gain authentic autonomy, independence, and sovereignty over their own affairs.
This dynamic is remarkably fragile and readily vulnerable to memetic warfare tactics. This is fortunate, since if the root problem really were sincere altruism, we would have an intractable uphill battle against innate human nature on our hands. Our basic instincts are fine, it’s the context and signaling which could use an update.
White SaviorismSpreading the mantra that “White Saviorism is White Supremacism 2.0” exposes the status signaling White liberal for White he is, a status-seeking opportunist relying upon minorities as pawns in the internecine battle between White liberals for status. Minorities themselves have actually been complaining about this for decades (centuries, actually), and minorities refusing to be condescended to will most likely be the ones who ultimately manage to deconstruct the White Savior social status game.
White Advocates can help this process along, but we can be especially effective by amplifying the voices of minorities who are pushing back against the White busybodies. Why is “escaping the ghetto” framed as tantamount to religious salvation in Hollywood, rather than raising up the ghetto? White Saviorism. Why is complete integration framed as the final solution to racial problems in the West rather than local and cultural autonomy? White Saviorism. Getting to integrate with Whites is seen by Whites as the ultimate gift one could offer to minorities.
Mock the White Saviors. It’s already making a difference.
CuckoldryAccusing White Saviors of cuckolding themselves is the natural counterpoint to the White Savior mentality, and it has gone so viral in American politics within the past few months because it strikes at the visceral root of the problem. It counter-balances the impulse to signal as socially dominant against the impulse to signal against the ultimate status-destroying perception that one is a victim of humiliation and dispossession.
Already, the “#cuckservative” phenomenon has split the mainstream conservative movement into mutually hostile factions. One side, featuring Donald Trump, Ann Coulter, and the more agile paleocons, is more confidently and directly speaking to White American interests than we’ve seen since the George Wallace campaign. The other, most prominently National Review, is doubling down on the altruistic signaling. NRO had literally dozens of articles shrieking about the villainy of White interests and its latest cover is from a Black “conservative” stooge who believes that Black votes should be weighted 5/3 as slavery reparationsm, blackspaining down to his readers about how they can win Black votes by appealing to Blacks’ explicit racial interests.
Organized Jewish CommunityOrganized Jewry didn’t actually create this White Savior dynamic, and we would most likely have organically arrived at White Saviorism as a response to the decline of the colonial White Supremacist world order on our own. Having said that, they’re the most dogged defenders of this status quo. White gentiles are earnestly striving for social status when they’re embracing the White Savior mentality, whereas the neocon Jewish conservative vanguard is knowingly leveraging it as a means of cuckolding our own group interests in the service of theirs.
One needn’t be the least bit conspiratorial or hateful about it. Merely calmly naming the Jew and his Jewish interests when he engages in the public debate goes a very long way toward limiting the effectiveness of their subversion. The Jewish infiltrators of White American political opinion rely on the implied “us,” and gently pricking that balloon sharply limits how much political subversion of White interests they’re capable of.
Confirming that Marco Rubio stands with Israel because of his billionaire Jewish donors, and that those same donors demand closed borders, racial dominance, and DNA testing for citizenship in their own country breaks the false framing they trot out for their loyalty to Israel. Jewish money and power still dwarfs gentile money and power in American politics. And, with the exception perhaps of the stray maverick billionaire, we can’t expect our voices in American politics to be as loud as Jewish voices just yet. But we can begin the awakening process, deconstruct the White Savior memeplex, and force Organized Jewry to be more circumspect in their subversion with some simple and attractive ideas.