Nov 23, 2015

The Political Cesspool Radio Broadcast: This Is How Real Men Speak!

via The Political Cesspool

Here’s an hour by hour breakdown of the November 21 broadcast:
Radio Show Hour 1
Host James Edwards gives a shout out to our loyal fans, covers the GOP warmongers who are shills for Israel, the madness at the University of Missouri, and Glenn Beck’s latest crying fit.
Radio Show Hour 2
James and co-host Keith Alexander cover pressing affairs of state, including Donald Trump’s recent rally in Texas.
Radio Show Hour 3
James and co-host and Eddie “The Bombardier” Miller discuss what’s going on in Europe and the Middle East and offer a solution.
If you missed our live show, click here to access our most recent program podcasts, or click here to access the complete broadcast archive dating back to 2004.

Israel's Treachery Is Rewarded: Most Damaging Spy in US History Is Freed

via DavidDuke.com

Jonathan Pollard, the man that prosecutors and Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger said was “the most damaging spy in U.S. history,” will be released today after intense Jewish lobby pressure. The move is an apparent quid pro quo for the Iran nuclear deal, which, despite the protests of hardline war hawks like Netanyahu, was itself done for Israel.

Here is the quotes from a Los Angeles Times from November 20 ,2015.


Even though the focus has been on Pollard he was sent by Israel to spy on America and the greatest damage to America came from Israel’s giving the information to the Soviet Union which caused the wiping out of much of America’s Communist spy network and the murder of hundreds of American operatives.

Pollard’s release was not opposed by the Justice Department last summer, much to the disappointment of a bipartisan coalition of the country’s national security elite, who have long argued that he had severely damaged U.S. interests..

.. Initially, Israel denied any official connection to Pollard, but it was quickly revealed that the operatives for whom he was working reported to an intelligence advisor to then-Prime Minister Shimon Peres…

…U.S. intelligence analysts said that he did it for cash, and that spies for the U.S. in the Soviet Union were discovered and probably killed because of Pollard’s actions.

“It is my belief, and the intelligence community was of the nearly certain belief, that assets [agents working for the U.S. overseas] were compromised,” said Joseph diGenova, who prosecuted Pollard.

DiGenova said Pollard passed the Israelis thousands of documents that had nothing to do with Israel’s enemies, including technical information about U.S. information systems and satellites, photographs, maps and classified manuals…

“It was a gigantic amount of information and stuff of the highest top-secret code word classification,” DiGenova said. He said that Israel bartered the information to the Soviet Union…compromising agents who quickly disappeared…
Israel did not officially acknowledge that Pollard was its spy until 1998, by which time the country’s failure to support him and fight for his release had became a political issue.

The fact that Israel could spy on America, steal its top secret intelligence information, and give it to America’s worst enemy at the time causing the death of hundreds of American operatives– and get away with it —  is mind-boggling.

In fact, not only did Israel not get bombed for this, or at least suffer sanctions and economic boycott, but continued to receive billions of dollars of weapons of mass destruction and cash, is proof of the absolute Zio treason and tyranny that runs both the government and media in America!

The ADL often says that dual Jewish dual loyalty is a lie, when in fact, it is not dual loyalty but singular loyalty to Israel and not America. It is illustrated by the uncensored writings of Dr. Steven Steinlight, former National Affairs chief of the largest Jewish organization in America, the American Jewish Committee. Here are his words

I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one…

Race in Brazil, Part II: The Complex Dynamic of Race in Brazil Today

via American Renaissance

Part 1

Author's Note: Part I described the history of immigration to Brazil, and the social and political currents that have led to today’s mixed-race population. This concluding section describes the intricate nature of race relations in Brazil today.

When civilians regained power in 1985, only the Left was well organized enough to take advantage of widespread dissatisfaction with the pro-American stance that had been taken by the military regime. The result has been an almost hegemonic power of the Left, which is symbolized by the current president, Dilma Rousseff, who led a terrorist organization that fought the military.

Mrs. Rousseff on trial in 1970.
Mrs. Rousseff on trial in 1970.

The Left slowly abandoned Marxism and now largely mimics the Democrat Party in the United States, with its broad coalition of “minorities,” promotion of “diversity,” and suspicion of heterosexual white men. What we see today is similar to the post-Tony Blair Labour Party in Britain and elsewhere in Europe. Despite an instinctively conservative electorate, the progressive Left manages to dominate the intelligentsia and the politics of Brazil.

The return to civilian rule led to a new constitution in 1988, which granted official protection to Indian reservations and quilombos. Many of those areas are rich in minerals, and this leads to frequent skirmishes with outsiders over development. The government has also introduced “affirmative action” for blacks, mulattoes, and Indians (but not Asians) in public universities and, more recently, for government jobs. Race, which had receded as an issue since the end of the policy of whitening Brazil, has become a problem. Blacks, who had quietly accepted a subservient status, have become much more demanding.

The many types of reservations take 34 percent of the land of Brazil. Brown: Land taken from unproductive owners and given to the poor as part of agrarian reform. Red: Quilombos. Pink: Indian Reservations. Green: Forest and jungle reserves.

The many types of reservations take 34 percent of the land of Brazil. Brown: Land taken from unproductive owners and given to the poor as part of agrarian reform. Red: Quilombos. Pink: Indian Reservations. Green: Forest and jungle reserves.

Metamorphosis in race relations

In the last three decades, the percentages of the self-reported racial identities of Brazilians have changed as follows:


Whites Brown/Multiracial Blacks Asians Indigenous Undeclared
1980 54.23 38.85 5.92 0.56 0.44
1991 51.56 42.45 5.00 0.43 0.20 0.36
2000 53.74 38.45 6.21 0.45 0.43 0.71
2010 47.73 43.13 7.61 1.09 0.43 0.00

Since there has been very little immigration, the changes in percentages are largely a reflection of the perception of who is white, which is very fluid and has little to do with biology. Two factors determine who is considered white: social class and region.

In the Northeast, where there are many blacks and dark-skinned mulattoes, most middle-class light-skinned mulattoes consider themselves white. Thus, in the Northeast, the average “white” person has about 76 percent European genes. In the South, the average self-identified white has European ancestry approaching 90 percent, and anyone with black hair and dark eyes is suspect.[1] Thus, a person who considers himself white in the Northeast might consider himself a mulatto in the South.

Wealth can confer whiteness. Thus, both the people in the photographs below are very rich and consider themselves white. The soccer player Ronaldo Luís Nazário de Lima is from the North and Giselle Bündchen is from the South.

Ronaldo and Giselle Bündchen
Ronaldo Luís Nazário de Lima and Giselle Bündchen

In a 2000 survey of people living in Rio de Janeiro who called themselves white, only 48 percent claimed to have pure European ancestry. The rest admitted to being various mixes of white, black and/or Indian.[2]

It is not unusual for mixed-race people to change their self-declared race over the course of their lives, especially if they have a big change in status. In the very rare cases in which a black or mostly-black person rises to upper-middle class or higher, the popular explanation is that he was a “black person with a white soul.”

In Brazil, self-identified white people–including light-skinned mulattoes–hold virtually all the political and economic power. In the middle and upper classes, whites may be openly against miscegenation, but a wealthy, light-skinned mulatto may be acceptable, especially outside the South.

Poor and lower-middle-class whites tend to be more race-blind, and sometimes even say race does not exist, but the many small skinhead and white power groups mostly come from the lower classes. They have their own bands, concerts, protests, and websites, and often clash with black power or anarchist street gangs. Ironically, a significant number of obviously mixed-race people are accepted in white power groups.

A skinhead demonstration in São Paulo, Brazil.
A skinhead demonstration in São Paulo, Brazil.

Probably the most fluid racial group is those who call themselves brown or multiracial. Most of them have some admixture of white, black and Indian. Their share of the population fluctuates greatly, since they may change how they identify themselves to the census several times during their lives.[3] For many, the last thing they want to be thought of is black. Someone with mostly-black parents but with lighter skin may call himself “brunette,” “olive skinned,” “tanned,” or even white. Most multiracial people associate blackness with failure and crime. If a mulatto is tempted to do something wrong, he may say “I am black, but not that black.”

Although the desire to be white has been a constant in Brazilian history, change may be coming. With the blessing of the government, movements to glorify black culture began to appear in the end of the 1990s, and identity politics have became the main strategy of the Left. The government gives money to non-profits promoting black pride, and even to music groups such as Raça Negra (Negro Race). These groups tell mulattoes and mostly-black people to “be truthful to your roots.” There is a magazine called Raça (Race) that promotes black culture and achievement, and tries to encourage mulattoes to think of themselves as black. Most of its employees and writers are either mixed-race or white.

As part of the widespread effort to try to make mulattoes proud of their blackness, schools have begun to follow the American lead in demonizing Europeans as inherently imperialistic, and playing up even the most trivial black accomplishments. Some even teach that the Egyptians were black. Race preferences for blacks in public universities and government jobs have caused outrage among whites but make it attractive to claim to be black.

As a typical affirmative-action gesture, former president Luiz Inácio da Silva appointed Judge Joaquim Barbosa as the first black Supreme Court judge. Nevertheless, black influence and power in society remain minimal, and the movement to make whites feel guilty has made very little headway.

Joaquim Barbosa
Joaquim Barbosa

Still, many mulattoes now call themselves black. As the number of pure blacks in Brazil outside of quilombos is very small, it is this shift in mentality that explains the sudden increase in the percentages of blacks and mulattoes and the decline of whites between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Asians are a special case. According to the 2010 census they account for only 1 percent of the population, and outside of São Paulo and Paraná states, they are almost invisible.[4] The overwhelmingly majority are from Japan, but there are a few Chinese and Koreans. They are seen as eternal outsiders no matter how many generations they have been in Brazil, and they tend to stay in their own communities. The rest of the population calls all Asians “Japs.”

Despite their insularity today, the early Japanese immigrants were mostly men, and were forced to mix with other races. By the third and fourth generation, 42 and 61 percent, respectively, were mixed.[5] Those with any vestige of Asian appearance are still seen as “Japs,” with the result that they are not entirely part of either the Brazilian or  unmixed Japanese communities.

In 1989, the Japanese government tried to boost a flagging population by offering huge incentives for Brazilians of Japanese descent–including third-generation immigrants–to return to Japan. Over 300,000 went back. It was a disaster. The Brazilian-Japanese–especially the second- and third-generation mixed-race Japanese–made little effort to learn the language, did not assimilate, established ghettos, were bad workers, and committed a lot of crime. Intermarriage between Brazilian-Japanese and native Japanese was minimal.

Japanese storekeepers put on special music when Brazilians came in so as to alert the staff to possible shoplifters. Some even put up signs saying, “no Brazilians allowed.” The police, who had been unarmed, began to carry weapons, and hired Portuguese teachers to help fight Brazilian crime.[6] The Japanese government started paying Brazilians to go back to Brazil and sign an oath saying they would never return.[7] The number of Brazilians dropped from more than 300,000 in 2007 to fewer than 200,000 in 2012.

There are 534 Indian reservations in Brazil, but only 0.43 percent of the population calls itself Indian. Genetically, this is absurd. A 2015 study of autosomal DNA, which summarized 25 studies of 38 different Brazilian populations, concluded that the proportion of Amerindian genes in the Brazilian population is 17 percent. [8] European genes were 62 percent and African genes were 21 percent.

The number of Indians in the census is so low because only those who still maintain a tribal affiliation call themselves Indians. Most of them live on reservations. People with significant Indian ancestry tend to call themselves “brown” or mixed race in the census. Outside reservations, the influence of Indians is essentially zero, but they sometimes stage protests and even take violent action to expand their protected areas.

Indian protest in Brazil.
Indian protest in Brazil


Separatist movements

In the orange states the majority calls itself mixed-race. In green states, the majority calls itself white.
In the orange states the majority calls itself mixed-race. In green states, the majority calls itself white.

Brazil is home to many different populations and cultures, but the main division is between lower Brazil, which is mostly white, and the upper part, which is heavily mixed. The map is a more or less accurate depiction, though the cultural divide crosses state borders. The North tends to vote for more leftist parties and the South for centrist ones.

Only the three southern-most states are actually majority white. The other three (Mato Grosso do Sul, São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro) are doubtful because so many light-skinned mulattoes call themselves white.

The three “Deep South” states–Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul–completely stand out from the rest of the country. They have a genuinely white population, a higher IQ, a lower murder rate, and architecture that is more interesting than the ad hoc buildings thrown up elsewhere. The Southern states are where one finds the majority of legal firearms, and include the only state, Rio Grande do Sul, where hunting is legal.

The three southern-most states also have the only significant separatist movement: Sul é Meu País (South is My Country.) It has respectable spokesmen who appear on radio and television in the region. They subtly allude to the South having a different racial and ethnic composition, but avoid outrage by saying that the reason for separation would be cultural.

The group is organizing a 2016 referendum on secession from Brazil to take place as part of municipal elections.[9] The federal government has not said how it would respond to a vote for independence, but it would probably try to prevent it. Many of the largest military bases are in the South, and the three white states are among the few that pay more in federal taxes than they receive in benefits. The secessionists claim a right to secede under international law.

Current crisis

Brazil is in the thick of several crises. There has been a huge corruption scandal involving the state-owned oil company, Petrobras. With high inflation, a very unfavorable exchange rate, and unemployment rising, President Rousseff has the lowest approval rating in the history of the country–only 8 percent–with 66 percent of voters in favor of impeachment.[10]

The country is also trying to figure out what to do with a huge influx of Haitians. When the tsunami hit Haiti in 2010, Brazil led the United Nations stabilization effort and ended up with an estimated 130,000 Haitian refugees–though the number is probably higher. Haitians, who have an average IQ of 67 [11], are mostly illiterate and practice voodoo. Many get refugee benefits, which the native population–many of whom feel economically vulnerable–deeply resent.

There is also white flight. Brazil has suffered from negative migration rates for decades, and the result is a severe brain drain, as the mostly European upper-middle class leaves for developed countries. The government pays its best students to study abroad. Many, especially those who come from disadvantaged backgrounds and who had never been outside Brazil, don’t go back. There are now many illegal immigrants from Brazil in the United States and Western Europe.

Brazilians do anything they can, including fraud, to show European ancestry in order to get European citizenship. A European passport is a ticket to life in Europe and is a “promotion” to European status. There is a seven-year backlog at the Italian embassy of Brazilians trying to get citizenship.[12]

The overall fertility rate in Brazil has been below the replacement rate for years, and now stands at 1.8 children per woman. Total fertility for whites is, of course, lower. Low fertility, combined with emigration, means the population is shrinking, which will put pressure on the welfare system. Even the leftist President Rousseff has cut benefits.

Our future?

While some say that the United States might in the future become “Brazil with nuclear weapons,” I think that is unlikely. Brazil is in the final stages of a once-majority-white society that has completely embraced multi-racialism, but Brazil is different from European-majority countries in two ways: It has high miscegenation rates and lacks an ethno-cultural identity. While there is some intermarriage in America and Western Europe, the rates are not nearly as high as in Brazil, where 43.13 percent of the population calls itself multiracial. In Brazil, except for the South, there is widespread acceptance that the concept of “Brazilian” covers a very mixed population. An independent South could go on to build a white nation with a coherent culture, but the rest of the Brazil is on course to become a giant failed state like Venezuela.

In Europe, there is still some inchoate sense of racial identity. There is no real effort to assimilate newcomers, and tensions are rising. When too many non-whites move in, Europeans move away. I believe Europeans will wake up to the threat of dispossession before it is too late. In the United States, when whites finally stop running away from non-whites, it could lead either to violent balkanization or peaceful secession.

Scenes like this are not uncommon in Rio de Janeiro.
Scenes like this are not uncommon in Rio de Janeiro.

On the other hand, if whites remain passive, the West will indeed become Brazil. This will mean decay at every level: constant class warfare, extreme income inequality, and organized crime that rivals the powers of the state. It will mean shocking levels of violence; Latin America has the world’s highest murder rates.[13] The state will severely restrict gun ownership among law-abiding citizens, but criminals will have plenty of weapons. Nor will turning into Brazil solve the problem of “racism.” Brazilians, mixed as they are, still stratify themselves into racial hierarchies.

Brazil must not be our future.

Notes:
[1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0017063 retrieved on September 3, 2015.
[2] Edward Eric Telles, “Racial Classification”, Race in Another America: the significance of skin color in Brazil, Princeton University Press, 2004, pages 81 to 84.
[3] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/17/brazil-census-african-brazilians-majority retrieved on September 25th, 2015.
[4] http://www.japao100.com.br/arquivo/nipo-brasileiros-estao-mais-presentes/ retrieved on September 17, 2015.
[5] http://www.labeurb.unicamp.br/elb/asiaticas/japones.htm retrieved on September 17, 2015.
[6] http://www.bbc.com/portuguese/noticias/2015/06/150518_decassegui_violencia_et_lab retrieved on September 17, 2015.
[7] http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1892469,00.html retrieved on September 17, 2015.
[8] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.22714/abstract retrieved on September 3, 2015.
[9] http://www.timbonet.com.br/movimento-o-sul-e-o-meu-pais-lanca-oficialmente-plebiscito-para-separacao-do-sul/ retrieved on September 4, 2015.
[10] http://datafolha.folha.uol.com.br/opiniaopublica/2015/08/1665278-recorde-reprovacao-a-dilma-supera-pior-momento-de-collor.shtml retrieved on September 3, 2015.
[11] Richard Lynn & Tatu Vanhanen, IQ & Global Inequality, Washington Summit Publishers, 2006, appendix 1.
[12] http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/cotidian/ff2710200908.htm retrieved on September 4, 2015.
[13] http://www.insightcrime.org/news-briefs/americas-replaces-africa-as-most-violent-region-in-world-un retrieved on September 4, 2015.

Cultural Appropriation: Free Ottawa Yoga Class Scrapped over "cultural issues"

via Radix

Student leaders have pulled the mat out from 60 University of Ottawa students, ending a free on-campus yoga class over fears the teachings could be seen as a form of "cultural appropriation."

Jennifer Scharf, who has been offering free weekly yoga instruction to students since 2008, says she was shocked when told in September the program would be suspended, and saddened when she learned of the reasoning.

Staff at the Centre for Students with Disabilities believe that "while yoga is a really great idea and accessible and great for students ... there are cultural issues of implication involved in the practice," according to an email from the centre.

The centre is operated by the university's Student Federation, which first approached Scharf seven years ago about offering yoga instruction to students both with and without disabilities.

The centre goes on to say, "Yoga has been under a lot of controversy lately due to how it is being practiced," and which cultures those practices "are being taken from."

The centre official argues since many of those cultures "have experienced oppression, cultural genocide and diasporas due to colonialism and western supremacy ... we need to be mindful of this and how we express ourselves while practising yoga."

The concept of cultural appropriation is normally applied when a dominant culture borrows symbols of a marginalized culture for dubious reasons -- such as the fad of hipsters donning indigenous headdresses as a fashion statement, without any regard to cultural significance or stereotype.

But Scharf, a yoga teacher with the downtown Rama Lotus Centre, said the concept does not apply in this case, arguing the complaint that killed the program came instead from a "social justice warrior" with "fainting heart ideologies" in search of a cause celebre.

"People are just looking for a reason to be offended by anything they can find," said Scharf.

"There's a real divide between reasonable people and those people just looking to jump on a bandwagon. And unfortunately, it ends up with good people getting punished for doing good things."

There were about 60 students who participated in the free program.

Acting student federation president Romeo Ahimakin denied the decision resulted from a complaint.

Ahimakin said the student federation put the yoga session on hiatus while they consult with students "to make it better, more accessible and more inclusive to certain groups of people that feel left out in yoga-like spaces. ... We are trying to have those sessions done in a way in which students are aware of where the spiritual and cultural aspects come from, so that these sessions are done in a respectful manner."

Scharf offered a compromise, suggesting she change the name from yoga to "mindful stretching," since that would reflect the content of the program and would "literally change nothing about the course."

"I'm not pretending to be some enlightened yogi master, and the point (of the program) isn't to educate people on the finer points of the ancient yogi scripture," she told the Sun.

"The point is to get people to have higher physical awareness for their own physical health and enjoyment."

According to email correspondence between Scharf and the centre, student leaders debated rebranding the program, but stumbled over how the French translation for "mindful stretching" would appear on a promotional poster, and eventually decided to suspend the program.

Student federation official Julie Seguin sympathized with Scharf, defending the use of the term "yoga," and saying, "I am also still of the opinion that a single complaint does not outweigh all of the good that these classes have done."

Seguin said "labeling the CSD's yoga lessons as cultural appropriation is questionable (and) debatable" and called on further discussion with the student executive.

Read the whole thing. The author saves some particularly amusing bits for the end. Most amusing of all is that all these “sensitivity” gurus don’t seem to recognize whose culture is being appropriated. Yoga is, of course, ultimately derived from Aryans. (Indeed, I fear I’m not quite White enough to grasp yoga’s spiritual dimensions.)

Conservatives usually look at episodes like this and exclaim that it’s “the latest in political correctness.” They usually miss two important points. Most obviously, they overlook the way in which PC isn’t just silly, and isn’t even just “egalitarian”; PC is anti-White and is directed at removing White people from positions of influence, at all levels, even yoga instructors for students with disabilities.

Secondly, conservatives overlook the ways in which the Left, often despite itself, is engaged in a kind of “quest for identity.” As I wrote not too long ago about the Rachel Dolezal controversy,
The American Left is, we are told, committed to the proposition that “race doesn’t exist” and functions as a “social construct.” In repeating such mantras, we overlook how much liberals and leftists are passionately and genuinely committed to the existence of race. Race is denied on the level of biology, to the extent that it is correlated with intelligence, behavior, and social outcomes, and thus becomes an unchosen “fate” for individuals. On the other hand, race is embraced as the formation of collective identity, meaning, history, and culture.
It is the Left that has been most active in racial consciousness formation: on campus, they have created not only African-American Students Association but “Asian” Students Associations, that is, racial consciousness where little cultural commonality existed.
Conservatives like to demean such things as “identity politics,” as just another car on the gravy train. But the reality is that Leftists are engaging in the kind of ideological project that traditionalists should be hard at work on—the formation of “meta-politics,” consciousness that transcends and precedes any political issue. Put simply, thinking racially—and by that I mean thinking spiritually, historically, and mythologically.
Just for the record, in a European Ethno-State, we would certainly allow for yoga, sushi, Kabuki theater, and even the burrito. The sign of a high culture is not so much its possession of folkways, for every folk has ways. It is, instead, its ability to “appropriate,” its ability to deepen and heighten existing forms. Christianity . . . Elizabethan drama . . . Italian opera . . . cinema . . . they all had crude beginnings.

The World is Flat: Tolerating and Welcoming Refugees from the Hivemind

via TradYouth

There’s been some controversy in the alt-right scene lately over whether the earth is a flat disk surrounded by the icy Antarctic wasteland or whether it’s spherical and spinning around. Astrophysics isn’t really my thing, but what I do know is that many of our supporters are Australians, South Africans, and Chileans, …none of whom report being upside-down. The TradYouth project takes no official position on the sphericity of the planet, but I certainly do.

The world is flat.

The world is flat, and it’s going to get flatter. I’m speaking metaphorically, of course. The traditional hierarchies and their methods of communication are getting flattened by the twin forces of massively distributed communication technology and the credibility crisis growing between the elites and the peasantry. This whole “flat earth” thing is most likely not a psyop intended to discredit us or an isolated incident to laugh off. It’s a harbinger of much more that’s in store as common folks lose faith in our society’s priesthood of appointed elders and start thinking for themselves.

We need to put a lot of thought into how we respond to the flat earth meme, because how we handle conspiratorial and anti-establishment positions of our comrades, allies, and persuadables will become a major challenge in outreach.



The proposition that the majority of folks are even capable of critical thinking is a cornerstone myth of the Enlightenment worldview. For the most part, the myth holds up for a long time in a homogeneous and stable society, because there’s an organic process where people naturally mirror their more educated, intelligent, and higher-status peers. That the overwhelming majority of folks find flat earth laughable says nothing about their grasp of astrophysics, geology, and even the most rudimentary critical thinking.

On this count, the flat earthers are absolutely correct. The majority of folks, including very bright folks, are just borrowing their dogmatic spherical position from the hivemind. Alex Jones types always carry on about the need to “investigate for yourself,” to “stop being a sheep,” and to “critically examine the world around you.” That sounds nice in theory, but the Bell Curve is what it is, people are too immersed in their families, occupations, and hobbies to invest the necessary time and energy it takes to have an intelligent position on everything. And even if they do find the time to investigate, there’s a gordian knot of lies, distractions, and rabbit holes sure to trip up all but the most keen critical thinkers.

blasphemer


Like it or not, we racial realists, anti-semites, and radical traditionalists are part-and-parcel of that rapidly growing phenomenon of the Western masses scrambling for lifeboats as the cruise liner of establishment consensus takes on water. The SPLC’s Mark Potok, in his recent Salon article, lists off ten “conspiracy theories” which have recently captivated the White American mind. Potok’s being the anti-White Jewish Leftist that he is, and he’s chortling alongside his fellow institutional “experts” at all of those White Americans believing wacky things.

This is analogous to a train conductor who’s heading for a cliff chortling to himself about all the fools injuring themselves as they dive off of the train. He smugly regards it as proof of their foolishness rather than understanding it for what it is: a growing credibility crisis that he and his friends are losing ground on. What all these people who believe these goofy things agree with us on is that the establishment narrative is a lie. They didn’t come to this position easily, or as a manifestation of some sort of undiagnosed mental illness, as the Leftists would like to imagine.

People know that they’ve been lied to. They have. But they have no way of knowing exactly what they’ve been lied to about or to what extent. They’re going to go off in some downright Fortean directions, and our opponents will continue actively encouraging them to slip deeper into Ripley’s Believe it or Not quackery. What we need to do is set aside our reflexive frustration with people we believe to be incorrect and strike a balance where we avoid getting entangled in or distracted by the maze of conspiratorial distractions which will only become more popular and elaborate as the ranks of refugees from the hivemind grows.

Go easy on the flat earthers. Without exception, everybody believes something ridiculous. Except for me, of course. The fear that they’ll drive off sensible people is overblown. We couldn’t stop people from diving for alternative social and political paradigms if we wanted. Like just about all of our victories, the credit rests with our enemies. They’re doing a terrible job of keeping White Americans on message, and they show no sign of self-correcting.



I’m confident that when the dust settles, the identitarian and traditionalist positions will have staying power that other alternative paradigms and memes will not. Besides, it’s not like it’s a zero-sum thing. I’m not sure I would climb into a space shuttling knowing that the folks at ground control were relying on the flat earth hypothesis for their calculations. But how plausible is that scenario?

Whether one’s a young earth creationist or an evolutionist, whether one’s a climate change denier or confirmer, society plugs along just fine when people believe wildly divergent things. Unless somebody is up to something patently dishonorable, the best policy is to gently encourage folks to place some daylight between their unorthodox opinions and our identitarian and traditionalist work and leave it at that. Identitarians around (aflat?) the world have to find a way to work past their knee-jerk reactions and figure out how to constructively work with a broad spectrum of identitarians if we hope to be unified enough to take on our powerful and aggressive opponents.

The Amorality of Atheism, Great Book

via Enza Ferreri

The Amorality of Atheism (Amazon USA)  (Amazon UK)  by Giorgio Roversi, an Italian author living in Britain, is a slim book that says everything that needs to be said.

Atheism is full of illogicalities both from an ethical and scientific viewpoint.

This book deals with the ethical aspect of atheism's self-contradictions, and it does it brilliantly.

The only consistency of atheist "morality" or rather of atheism in general is with the requirements of a society that simply wants to follow its own wishes and urges without any constraints.

But this is also a society which was founded on Christianity, therefore the remnants of the ethical system that has dominated it for almost two millennia still echo in the hollow chamber of even the most entrenched atheists.

And here is the origin of another contradiction: modern secularists want their cake and eat it. They don't want an external source of their morality so they can forge it the way they like it, but at the same time they want to feel to be self-righteous and doing "the right thing". So they claim that those qualities and acts that we consider good only in virtue of their adherence to the Christian values can find their grounds on something else. But what?

The options offered are all wanting.

Science. One of the most irrational claims of many atheists is that science can guide morality. Hume's principle is here an invincible obstacle: you cannot derive "ought" from "is".

Subjectivity. But that, as Roversi says, is the opposite of morality, which must by its own very nature be universal and therefore objective.

"Nice, good" feelings, like empathy and compassion. But we also have nasty, bad feelings, destructive and harmful to others. If we are only a conglomerate of atoms and cells bent solely towards survival and self-interest, on what rational - not emotional - grounds can we choose which are better between those two competing groups of feelings?

This book should be read by everyone because the subject it deals with concerns all of us in the most fundamental and vital way. A society cannot survive without ethics and, therefore, without God.

The West is trying on itself an experiment that is bound to fail and is already failing, as we can see, for example, from the devastation of the family, the race towards primitivism, the erosion of civilisation and all their consequences, like multiculturalism, destructive immigration and the growing power of Islam.

Giorgio Roversi's The Amorality of Atheism is the antidote to the poisonous misconceptions and deceptions spread by Hollywood, the mass media and the elites (political and intellectual) every minute of every day.

This book is very highly recommended.

Christ, Nietzsche, and Caesar: Excerpt of a 1933 Speech by Sir Mosley on the Historical Roots of Fascism

via Ur-Fascist Analytics

Sir Oswald Mosley founded the British Union
of Fascists to awaken the British will to live
Ur-Fascist Analytics Editor's Note: The following is from a speech Sir Mosley gave to the English-Speaking Union in 1933. It is partially reproduced in his book, My Life, and appears on OswaldMosley.com. In it, Sir Mosley responds to the claim that fascism lacks a historical and intellectual basis. 
Our opponents allege that Fascism has no historic background or philosophy, and it is my task this afternoon to suggest that Fascism has roots deep in history and has been sustained by some of the finest flights of the speculative mind. I am, of course, aware that not much philosophy attaches to our activities in the columns of the daily press. However, I trust you will believe that those great mirrors of the public mind do not always give a very accurate reflection, and while you only read of the more stirring moments of our progress, yet there are other moments, which have some depth in thought and constructive conception. 
I believe that Fascist philosophy can be expressed in intelligible terms, and while it makes an entirely novel contribution to the thought of this age, it can yet be shown to derive both its origin and its historic support from the established thought of the past. 
In the first instance, I suggest that most philosophies of action are derived from a synthesis of cultural conflicts in a previous period. Where, in an age of culture, of thought, of abstract speculation, you find two great cultures in sharp antithesis, you usually find, in the following age of action, some synthesis in practice between those two sharp antitheses which leads to a practical creed of action. 
I would suggest to you that in the last century, the major intellectual struggle arose from the tremendous impact of Nietszchian thought on the Christian civilisation of two thousand years. That impact was only very slowly realised. Its full implications are only today working themselves out. But turn where you will in modern thought, you find the results of that struggle for mastery of the mind and the spirit of man. I am not myself stating the case against Christianity, because I am going to show you how I believe the Nietszchian and the Christian doctrines are capable of synthesis. 
On the one hand you find in Fascism, taken from Christianity, taken directly from the Christian conception, the immense vision of service, of self-abnegation, of self-sacrifice in the cause of others, in the cause of the world, in the cause of your country; not the elimination of the individual, so much as the fusion of the individual in something far greater than himself; and you have that basic doctrine of Fascism, service, self-surrender to what the Fascist must conceive to be the greatest cause and the greatest impulse in the world. On the other hand you find taken from Nietszchian thought the virility, the challenge to all existing things which impede the march of mankind, the absolute abnegation of the doctrine of surrender; the firm ability to grapple with and to overcome all obstructions. You have, in fact, the creation of a doctrine of men of vigour and of self-help which is the other outstanding characteristic of Fascism. 
At the moment of a great world crisis, a crisis which in the end will inevitably deepen, a movement emerges from a historic background which makes its emergence inevitable, carrying certain traditional attributes derived from a very glorious past, but facing the facts of today, armed with the instruments which only this age has ever conferred upon mankind. By this new and wonderful coincidence of instrument and of event the problems of the age can be overcome, and the future can be assured in a progressive stability. Possibly this is the last great wave of the immortal, the eternally recurring Caesarian movement; but with the aid of science, and with the inspiration of the modern mind, this wave shall carry humanity to the further shore.

ISIS Is not the Crisis

via Alternative Right

The old cloud/silver lining metaphor
The first point that has to be emphasized is that we don’t live in a humanist society, that is a society defined by what we like to think of as human characteristics – sentience, foresight, willpower, transindividualism, etc. We live in a society that is more bee-like, frog-like, or sheep-like – the blind hive mind and unthinking herd – that reacts without consciousness, without vision, without leadership, hierarchy, and direction.

This means that we are incapable as societies or as a civilization of doing our own thinking, therefore actions and events have to do our thinking for us – reconnecting us to the realities we constantly stray from.

The second point that has to be emphasized is that the greatest danger for the sleepwalker and the frog bather is gradualism, the slow, incremental arrival of death and extinction, the gradual upping of temperature until we are reduced to a sickly green soup. This has been our condition for most of the post-war period and threatens to be our condition until our doom.

We therefore should be extremely grateful for the existence of ISIS, because ISIS allows us to perceive through our desensitised and sedated shells the reality of what is developing, even if ISIS had never existed, namely the replacement of Western civilization by what will be a hybrid of Islam and the West.

Before ISIS, this change was already well underway, with our negative culture of "freedoms," whateverism, and atomization, slowly giving way to the crude positivism of Islam and its clear definition of roles along lines of demographic expansion. The frog was being slowly boiled and finding great comfort in the relaxing warmth of the bath.

How the boiling frog sees itself.
Luckily ISIS came along, a weird accident of Middle Eastern geopolitics and asymmetrical warfare, with one foot in the ascendant troll culture of the internet, and now – praise be to Allah – we have more and more people thinking about things outside the slowly boiling frog’s comfort zone.

They may be signalling extra hard about how “terrorism has no religion” and “Islam is a religion of peace” (LOL), and all that other foolishness, but the fact is their zombie minds are being pushed inexorably closer to the great realities, and at a relatively low cost in terms of force of events. A lot of Liberal Leftist bullshit is being expended – and lost – to maintain the overextended front lines of the Left against what is essentially a skirmish from reality.

We are once again seeing the economical nature of war. The fact is that the attack on Paris was more shocking than terrible, and had an enormous impact on the Western psyche for a mercifully low cost. Yes, I know that will sound callous to the sheeplike, but it really isn’t. Eight well-armed jihadis attacking particularly soft targets in Paris only killed around about 130 people (although that figure may climb as some seriously wounded people die).

The numbers from Paris are also incredibly low compared to the numbers from Rotherham, Sweden, and wherever else societies become fractured through multiculturalism and Muslims mass rape and kill non-Muslims. But most of all we are talking about the future genocide of Western people and a civilization comprising around 800 million largely confused people. If it takes 130 dead cafe and concert goers in Paris to make people wake up to that fact, then so be it, although I believe that number too will have to rise considerably.

The sad fact is that at the moment we actually need ISIS, because we have lost our ability to think as a society, as a collective with a defined positive identity, and as a civilization capable of defending itself. We have become a great “sucking hole,” obsessed with our egos and “freedoms” and oblivious of our coming collective death. As it stands at the moment, the West is already effectively dead without a radical change of direction.

The worst thing would be if ISIS were to disappear and we got back to the taqiyyah and gradual "soft" infiltration of the West by the demographically more potent Third World, under the guise of the false, sheep-like humanism of globalism and "human rights."

ISIS might well disappear. As an organization it is a delicate flower and a tremulous presence, its strength an illusion. Once the various powers involved in the Middle Eastern morass of Syria and Iraq can work out a rough agreement, its days will be numbered. But when that happens its anti-Western essence will simply resume its quiet infiltration of the West.

Let us hope that that day never comes, or is at least long delayed. Let us hope that the chaos that feeds these exemplars of our future demographic doom at the hands of Third World colonization, continues until all the Liberal Leftist garbage currently being used to maintain the unworkable illusions of the West is exhausted. Then let us hope that a new Europa arises, with a firm identity and a clear perception of its collective interests, that can forever defend itself against such future threats.

Imagine No Narcissists: Liberal Responses to the Vibrancy in Paris

via The Occidental Observer

Thames Valley Police are the tireless crime-fighters responsible for protecting the people of Oxfordshire in southern England. But their resources are limited, so they have to make sure they respond only to genuine crimes, not to trivial complaints. This, for example, is how they treat a trivial complaint:

One girl, referred to as Girl A for legal reasons, felt brave enough to face her abusers in court, while others gave evidence from behind a curtain. She wept as she described how the gang threatened to burn her younger brother alive unless she had sex with them. She was repeatedly raped and sold for sex between 2004 and 2007 when she was aged 12 to 15.
When she went to police [in Oxford], no action was taken. She claimed that they threatened to arrest her instead. “They threatened on a number of occasions to arrest me for wasting police time for turning up at a police station in a state after running away,” she said. “Any self-respecting police officer would have seen something was wrong. If you pick up a child who is covered in cigarette burns and bruises, something is fundamentally wrong. Adults should be doing their jobs, it’s not down to a child.” (Oxford sex gang: girls as young as 11 “forced into prostitution”, The Daily Telegraph, 14th May 2013)
Child rape? Child prostitution? Not a problem to Thames Valley Police when non-White males were responsible. Here, by contrast, is a serious crime that prompted them to leap into action:
A 43-year-old woman has been arrested over a racially abusive message posted on a beauty salon’s Facebook page. The woman has been named locally as April Major, the owner of the at-home beauty business in Bicester, Oxfordshire. The post, made following the terrorist attacks in Paris, said the salon is ‘no longer taking bookings from anyone from the Islamic faith, whether you are UK granted with passport or not.’
Thames Valley Police arrested the woman yesterday after receiving a number of complaints about the message. A Thames Valley Police spokeswoman said: ‘We have arrested a 43-year-old woman in Bicester today after a number of complaints about a racially abusive post on social media. The woman was arrested under section 19 of the Public Order Act which relates to the display of written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting with the intention of stirring up racial hatred, and for producing malicious communications. We take all such complaints seriously and will investigate. If you suspect that racially aggravated crimes are being committed please report them to Thames Valley Police on 101.’ (Police arrest woman for ‘racially abusive’ Facebook post banning Muslims from beauty salon because it is ‘time to put my country first’, The Daily Mail, 16th November 2015)
Thames Valley Police allowed Muslim men to rape and prostitute White girls for at least six years without lifting a finger to interfere. But they acted immediately when a White woman said she didn’t want Muslim customers for her private business.

They also lied about the nature of her message. Islam isn’t a race, so April Major wasn’t being “racially abusive.” And so what if she had been? She should be free to serve whomever she wishes in her own business. As it is, she’s arrested for trying to exercise a traditional British freedom. That’s the authoritarian aspect of the perverted liberalism now ruling the modern West. Here’s an example of the narcissistic aspect:
The previously unnamed man who played John Lennon’s ‘Imagine’ on a portable piano outside Paris’ Le Bataclan — scene of a deadly terror attack — has told the story behind his performance. David Martello, 34, embarked upon the 400 mile trip after hearing the news on TV in a German pub, the Guardian reports. “I phoned my friend to talk about it, got in the car and drove all through the night,” he said. “I just knew I had to do something. … I wanted to be there to try and comfort, and offer a sign of hope.”
At least 127 people are reported dead after a series of violent attacks in Paris on Friday night. Le Bataclan was among the worst hit, with 87 civilians killed during a shooting at an Eagles of Death Metal gig. Members of the public gathered outside the venue on Saturday morning (November 14) as Martello, who had travelled all the way from Konstanz in Germany, played an instrumental version of Lennon’s famous track. … Lennon’s ‘Imagine’ famously features the lyrics: “Imagine there’s no countries / It isn’t hard to do / Nothing to kill or die for / And no religion too / Imagine all the people / Living life in peace”. (‘Imagine’ pianist traveled 400 miles to perform John Lennon song in Paris, NME.com, 15th November 2015)
When Enoch Powell “imagined” the future effects of mass immigration in 1968, liberals howled with outrage and drove him into the political wilderness. Now his prophecies are coming true all across Europe. The massacre in Paris was a spectacular event, but the 129 deaths there are a fraction of the true cost imposed on France by non-White immigration. How many “Gauls” — as Muslims in France contemptuously describe the native French — have been murdered, raped, beaten and robbed by their enrichers over the decades? The same question, mutatis mutandis, can be asked in many other White nations, from the United States to Australia. But White liberals continue to prefer lies and fantasies to ugly reality.

Ephraim Mirvis: Open borders for goyim, not for Jews
Ephraim Mirvis: Open borders for goyim, not for Jews

And so do ethnocentric Jews like Britain’s Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis. He appeared on BBC radio after the Paris massacres, fresh from a visit to a “refugee” camp in Greece. With infinite empathy and compassion, he expressed his hopes that, despite the unfortunate events in Paris, the goyim would remember that there are only a few bad apples among the hundreds of thousands of victims fleeing war and persecution by moving from Turkey and Greece to Germany and Britain. Meanwhile, in Israel, empathy and compassion for migrants and refugees were in short supply:
In May, I attended a graduation party in Tel Aviv for Taj Jemy, a 28-year-old asylum seeker from Sudan. He gave a speech about the war in his home, Darfur, and how he wished his family could be in Tel Aviv to see him graduate and receive his bachelor’s degree. Africans, dressed in their best clothes, and some Israelis, filled the room, clapping and celebrating. He ended, “If I can do this, you can as well,” and everyone gathered there wanted to believe him. The celebration was interrupted by the Israeli police, who burst into the room, scattering the crowd. The partygoers recalling their skills of hiding, ducking and fleeing, spilled onto the street to find it barricaded and surrounded by horses. Seven people were arrested that night for not having their visas with them.
Israel’s policy toward African asylum seekers is to pressure them to self-deport or, as the former interior minister Eli Yishai put it, to “make their lives miserable” until they give up and let the government deport them. About 60,000 African asylum seekers have entered Israel since 2005, most of them Muslims from the Darfur region of Sudan, and Orthodox Christians from Eritrea; today that number is closer to 45,000. (Israel’s chilly reception for African asylum seekers, The New York Times, 31st October 2015)
Israel doesn’t just avoid violent crime and terrorism by deporting Third-World enrichers or fencing them out. It also avoids a massive drain on its public health services:
For refugee children newly arrived in the U.S., hepatitis B, tuberculosis, parasitic worms, high blood lead levels and anemia are among the top public health concerns covered by screening programs. In one of this nation’s largest-ever epidemiological studies of refugee children, public health researchers describe the health profiles of children arriving here in the past decade as their families fled persecution.
Researchers from the PolicyLab at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) have created the first multi-state, large-scale data set for refugee children who arrived in the U.S. between 2006 and 2012. The children arrived from six countries, three in Asia and three in Africa. “Understanding the health profiles of children from different countries allows us to provide better counseling for parents, prioritize specific tests and ensure that we give children a healthy start here in the U.S.,” said lead author Katherine Yun, M.D., M.H.S., a pediatrician at PolicyLab and in CHOP’s Refugee Health Program. The study appeared Nov. 12 in the American Journal of Public Health.
The study team analyzed medical data from 8,148 refugees, all under age 19, from Bhutan, Myanmar, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Iraq and Somalia. The data were collected in medical screening visits completed shortly after children arrived in four states: Colorado, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Washington. (Large study sums up health issues for new child refugees to U.S., ScienceDaily, 13th November 2015)
The same diseases are being carried into Europe by the current flood of “refugees.” Who will pay for treatment? Ordinary White tax-payers, of course. That’s their role in life: to fund their own dispossession. If they object, they will be arrested. They must not point out that Third-World immigration introduces terrorism, crime, and diseases that were unheard of in the West. That’s merely reality, and our liberal elite aren’t concerned with reality. They concentrate on something much more important: feeding their own narcissism — and in the case of Jews, advancing their ethnic interests — while the West burns.

My Honour Is Loyalty

via Western Spring

As the days draw in around Autumn and move towards Winter, we in Britain, Europe and the Northern Hemisphere begin to think of the way Nature sheds its old forms. Travelling in its inexorable way towards closure, it’s entirely appropriate that we should be reminded of past lives and times, as if by some hidden hand, we also find ourselves commemorating the dead from two world wars. Nevertheless, in recent years a controversy has broken out as to whether British nationalists should commemorate events that have done so much damage to our folk; both to our own immediate nation of Great Britain and to the wider folk community which embraces all Europeans of kindred racial stock.

It may at first sight appear to be common sense that racial patriots would honour, without question, all those who gave their lives for their country, almost regardless of the fact that in many ways they were misled by a cynical establishment into making a futile and self-defeating sacrifice. However, with the passing of time and the ever increasing hypocrisy of our traitorous politicians, sporting their poppies more as a politically correct shibboleth than as a mark of respect for those who actually died in the fighting, we’re forced to look for ways in which to distinguish ourselves from the unseemly low life that constitutes such posing, political prostitutes.

Such is the nature of their betrayal that within seventy years of our supposed ‘victory’, the indigenous British now number less than 45% of the total population of our once proud, imperial, city of London. According to a May 2015 edition of ‘The Daily Telegraph’ the demographic statistics for various parts of England are…London 44.9% British… West Midlands 79% British…The South East 85% British…and the East Midlands 85% British. According to the same article an average of 140,000 White Britons are leaving the country each year and some 2,000,000 Britons of working age have left our shores during the last decade. Yet, without knowing the racial demographics, a total of 318,000 more people arrived in these islands last year than left and it’s not Swedes or Germans who we see filling our big cities. The great contemporary historian, David Irving once wrote to the effect that if the average British Tommy could have foreseen the country his children would inherit he wouldn’t have gone so much as 100 yards up the Normandy beach during the landings.

Our cities have become so alien to our people, because of coloured immigration, many indigenous Britons feel more at home amongst fellow Europeans in countries such as Spain or wherever they can find a suitable White enclave, than they do in their own transformed native land. The well loved television and film comedian, John Cleese, now living in USA, has been quoted as saying after the recent London riots that mass immigration has turned London into a city that is no longer English. Having grown up in Somerset, he said that he now feels like a foreigner walking through the streets of London. Asked what he thought about the recent London riots he replied, “I’m not sure what’s going on in London, because London is no longer an English city. That’s how we got the Olympics. They said we were the most cosmopolitan city on earth. But it doesn’t feel English.”

Even the well known British predilection for wholesome comedy has become cheapened and no longer funny of late. The TV programmers are too frightened of upsetting minorities, of one sort or another, by straying beyond the bounds of political correctness. As a result it would be unthinkable for them to reshow the once popular, self parodying, Alf Garnet series, ‘Till Death do us Part.’ Instead, what now passes for TV comedy is often little more than a stream of bad tempered exchanges between unlikeable and socially inept individuals. At least Alf Garnet was a Racist!

But, why has all this occurred? Could there be a connection between our supposed “victory” in the Second World War and the parlous state in which our country now finds itself? The short answer is yes! Yes, because by destroying National Socialist Germany we were also destroying something of ourselves. By attacking our German racial kin we were also attacking our own bloodline and culture. Could any of this have been foreseen? The answer is also a most definite, yes!

Despite unremitting media lies, far from being a crazed megalomaniac, intent on conquering the world and murdering every Jew in sight, Hitler was a man of peace, desperate to stop the War between Britain and Germany. According to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Louis Kilzer…

“Hitler believed the future of Western civilization depended on the cooperation of Germany and her Aryan cousins: England and the United States. His territorial demands were limited to Communist Russia, which he regarded as a proxy for Jewish world ambitions. He was determined to avoid fighting a war on two fronts. 

“The miracle of Dunkirk was in fact an extraordinary peace overture to England…

“In May 1940, the British were on the verge of defeat. The English army was trapped in Dunkirk. Rather than take them prisoner, Hitler halted his generals for three days allowing 330,000 men to escape.

“‘The blood of every single Englishman is too valuable to shed,’ Hitler said. ‘Our two peoples belong together racially and traditionally. That has been my aim even if our generals can’t grasp it.'”

Members of the British Fascist movement clearly foresaw the peril Britain was facing and did everything they could to oppose Churchill’s warmongering. Even after war had been declared Sir Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists, held some of his largest street rallies, campaigning for peace even. It wasn’t until May 1940 that he was eventually arrested alongside some 747 other Fascists, including 96 women. Whilst the majority of Fascists were interned in an Isle of Man concentration camp Mosley was held separately in Brixton prison for fear that his oratorical skills might foment a rebellion were he allowed to mix freely with his comrades. Unlike other, equally patriotic, Fascists such as William Joyce and John Amery, Mosley denied that he wanted to see Germany defeat Britain. In fact he made an analogy between his position in trying to stop the war and that of a man who tries to prevent his cantankerous old mother picking a fight with the local heavies.

In his autobiography, ‘My Life’, Mosley quotes Churchill as saying, “I have not become the King’s first minister to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire”, and comments, “Yet this is exactly what happened as a direct result of his policy.”

Was Churchill so politically naive as to suppose he could get away with destroying most of Europe and still leave the Empire intact? One would hardly think so, and yet as others have pointed out, the Second World War was essentially a religious war fought with a Manichean fanaticism. A fanaticism still very apparent today for the increasing number of people who step out of line and question the doctrines of its victors. One of the characteristics of much religious belief is the supremacy of wishful thinking… of hope over experience.

Perhaps the saddest and least forgivable aspect of the Second World War was the way in which it divided loyalties. This was most dramatically illustrated by the suicide and lingering death of Unity Mitford who found the horror and tension within her upon the outbreak of war, between two countries she loved, unbearable.

One staunch patriot who also went on to become the Chairman of the National Front was A K Chesterton. Having been a leading member of Mosley’s British Union of Fascists, “A K”, as he affectionately came to be known, had fewer qualms about taking up arms against Germany both in the First World War, when he lied about his age, and again later in 1939. A Shakespearean scholar and an astute political thinker, “A K” was certainly not oblivious to the dangers of the War but chose to support the British side out of a worthy, if misguided, sense of loyalty. Another case of hope triumphing over experience perhaps! The underlying reason that “A K”‘s first post-War organisation, the League of Empire Loyalists, ended up without an Empire to which one could be loyal is an irony which would not have been lost on him.

While many brave servicemen fought courageously in two world wars and in the process often sacrificed life and limb they were at least acclaimed as heroes. More lonely and bitter was the path of super patriots William Joyce, ‘Lord Haw Haw’, and John Amery, son of Leo Amery, a minister in Churchill’s government no less! John Amery attempted to recruit British Prisoners of War to fight on the Eastern Front under the ‘Legion of St.George’ banner. Despised by an alien, manipulated public opinion, enough is known of both their stories for it to be unnecessary to elaborate further here, except to point out that their absolute integrity, intelligence and unyielding loyalty to their native islands and race, made it impossible for them to follow any other course. When on December 19th 1945 John Amery finally met his doom in the form of hangman Albert Pierrepoint, showing immense sangfroid, he greeted him with the words, “Mr. Pierrepoint, I’ve always wanted to meet you, but of course not in these circumstances. Refusing the proffered hand Pierrepoint nevertheless later said that Amery was the bravest man he had ever hanged.

In commemorating the fallen this Autumn racial patriots will have in mind to honour the courage and sacrifice of all sides in “two brother’s wars” but not least the moral courage of those who, knowing the truth, chose a lonely death.

A Homeland for Whites

via Cambria Will not Yield

The liberals’ incredible double-dealing is obvious. On the one hand we are told that we must abort all babies born in the European nations, because there are too many babies being born. And then on the other hand we are told we must allow an unlimited amount of Moslems into European nations. Why must we do this? Because we are commanded to go over the cliff with the swinish liberals who are possessed by the devil. – CWNY
Mahomet planted in Arabia a new Religion, directly opposite to the Christian Religion; yet such as did in a good Measure express in Words, the Life of a great Part of the Christians. This Religion was first embraced by the Saracens, who revolted from the Emperor Heraclius; whose Arms quickly subdued Arabia, Syria, Palaestine, Egypt, Persia, and afterwards they invaded Africa, and came over Sea into Spain. But the Power of the Saracens was derived to others, particularly to the Turks, a very war-like People, who after many long Engagements with the Saracens, being desired to enter into a League, they easily embraced a Religion agreeable to their Manners, and transferred the Imperial Power to themselves. Having taken the Cities of Asia and Greece, and the Success of their Arms increasing, they came into the Borders of Hungary and Germany… This Religion, which was plainly calculated for Bloodshed, delights much in CeremoniesHugo Grotius


*******

When something as dramatic as the Paris massacre occurs, I briefly, ever so briefly, hope that my people will “wake up” and become white men again But then, like the man in the song called “The Green, Green Grass of Home,” I realize that “I was only dreaming.” (1) Men interpret external events according to the a priori passion that is in their hearts. I see the Paris massacre as the inevitable result of the white man’s rejection of Christian Europe for multicultural, democratic Europe. The liberal sees the massacre as a temporary setback on the way to utopia.

What is the difference between the Islamic Jihadist and the liberal? They both desire the death of white people, because of the whites’ Christian past, so why do the liberals seem outraged? The modern liberals are like the Jacobins who finally turned on Robespierre. They weren’t repudiating the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity, they were just repudiating Robespierre’s excessively violent way of going about the business of liberty, equality, and fraternity. If Robespierre had scaled down the blood-letting and toned down the rhetoric, he could have blended right into democratic, regicidal France. Let us never forget that former French President Nicolas Sarkozy said as recently as 2009 that France was a regicide nation. And so are they all – every single modern European nation – regicide nations. They have murdered Christian Europe and are committed to the extermination of the Christ-bearing race. So it is the excessive violence of the Jihadists that the liberals object to, not the Jihadists goal of eliminating every last remnant of Christian Europe.

The liberals’ second objection to the perpetrators of the Paris massacre has to do with the two camps’ differing views of utopia. The liberals envision a multicultural state in which everyone subscribes to liberal ideals. The Jihadists envision a utopian Moslem state in which everyone adheres to Islamic law. It is the mythical belief of the liberals that the Jihadists are not the real Moslems. In the liberals’ eyes of unreality the Jihadists are the bad Moslems who won’t settle down and enjoy the fruits of multicultural Liberaldom. (2) This is why the conservatives, who are not conservative, and their liberal allies never talk about expelling all Moslems from the European nations. That would run counter to the liberals’ faith that all religions except the Christian religion, and all races except the white race, can live in perfect peace and harmony so long as they make their utopia the complete opposite of Christian Europe.

The liberal stentors run the European nations, so the great lie, which would not have convinced a five-year-old from the 19th century, has become the constant refrain of the liberals: ‘Islam is good, those Jihadists are the small minority… etc.’ What can we expect from the people who have already told us that Mexicans and blacks are sacred?

As a result of the liberals’ ‘good and bad Moslems’ narrative the retired generals want to step up the bombing over there in order to get the bad Moslems. That would be a wonderful strategy, wouldn’t it? The American bombers destroyed Saddam Hussein’s government, which kept ISIS-like groups under control, so let us see if we can further destabilize the region with more bombing. Every solution but the obvious solution is suggested, the obvious solution being that we put an end to multiculturalism and expel all Moslems from the European nations. That is also the solution to the black and Mexican problem as well. But we will never see such a policy from European governments, because all the European governments are Jacobin governments, which cannibalize their own people in the name of democracy and multiculturalism.

If Africa, Europe, and the United States are to be reserved for the black race, if Mexico and the United States are to be reserved for the Aztec race, and if Islam is going to be the religion of the Europeans as well as the Arabs, where will white Christians dwell? It is not inhumane to send the heathens and the colored strangers back to their own lands, it is the only humane, Christian policy that a European can follow. If you don’t defend your own racial hearth fire, you are not a Christian; in point of fact you are worse than the heathens.

The white race is not being driven off the earth because of the Moslems, the Jews, or the colored barbarians. The white race is self-destructing, because liberalism has made white people defenseless in the face of the enemy. If you believe that it is sinful to love your own people, to feel a sentimental attachment to those smaller, familial, and racial units of life that Burke celebrates, you will not fight for your people. You will most probably fight against your own people. The antique Europeans had their problems with the Jews, the Moslems, and colored barbarians, but they managed to preserve their civilization despite having to battle the anti-Christian (and therefore anti-European) forces arrayed against them. And because they preserved their racial hearth fire they were able to turn a Christian Europe over to their heirs. Is our modern Babylon really better than Christian Europe? Is legalized sodomy better than heterosexual love sanctified by marriage? Is a culture that permits miscegenation better than a culture that does not sanction such a blasphemy? Should that charity of honor culture give way to the cruelty of Islam and black voodoo? It is liberalism that must be defeated before white people can reclaim their identity as a people and recapture the spirit to fight all the satanic coalitions of heathens and colored barbarians that our ancestors fought against so successfully.

Liberalism is a reenactment of the fall of man. The liberals have hardened their hearts against the Light of the world and turned to Satan for salvation from the Christian God. Adam and Eve hid from God after their fall from grace. The liberals seek to destroy all remnants of Christian Europe so they will have no nagging reminders of their fall from grace. And white people, even those whites who have completely repudiated Christian Europe, are a reminder of the pre-satanic era of European history. They must die. Such is the credo of the liberal.

Once we grasp the fact that the liberal’s heart is envenomed with a hatred for Christ and His people, we can understand why everything he does seems contrary to reality. We can understand why the liberal governments disarm their white citizens in black and Moslem urban zones of terror. We can understand why white “racism” is deemed a greater threat than colored barbarism, and we can understand why the protection of white people is considered an unholy blasphemy. In the liberal’s hardened heart, Satan is lord, and he sees everything from Satan’s perspective. Satan desires the physical destruction of the white race, but he also desires their spiritual destruction as well. This is why the liberals’ attack on white people always includes an attack on their past, their Christian past. “Despair and die,” Satan tells us through his liberal stentors. “Fight in my name and triumph,” our Lord tells us.

The violation of our race is the moral equivalent of a home invasion. If we don’t hold our racial home as inviolable then we have no soul that we can call our own. We will be mere shadows of men and women, roaming the earth hoping to find that which was lost. The conservatives who will not fight for that which was lost, our racial hearth fire, are not conservative. They are simply appendages of the liberals.

The Paris massacre is a slightly more dramatic event in the continual war against the white race, but it is not an aberration. The massacre is part of the liberals’ fantasy – a white-free world. No liberal or liberal conservative has changed one iota because of the massacre. The liberals still talk about kindness and compassion for the terrorists and the conservatives talk about bombing bad Moslems in order to make the world safe, not for white people, but for democracy. Right after the Paris massacre the Canadian Prime Minister announced his determination to go ahead with his plan to admit thousands of Syrian ‘refugees’ into Canada. Obama, Merkel, and all the church groups remain steadfast as well; they will not abandon their ‘compassion’; they will open up their hearts to their Moslem brethren. (3) And why are the Moslems the liberals’ brethren? Their lifestyle seems completely opposed to the liberals’ lifestyle. But then the blacks’ and the Aztecs’ lifestyles seem completely opposed to liberalism as well, so we are still left with the ‘why?’ Of course, we know why. The liberals have one overriding passion in their heart, one faith – there is one evil and that is whiteness. Whoever opposes the white race is good, no matter what they say or do that seems contrary to liberalism. Because the liberals believe that the Christ-bearing race must be destroyed, even if whites have ceased to carry the Christ Child, one is tempted to offer some practical advice to the white Europeans: “Since you are damned as the Christ-bearing race, why don’t you pick up that burden and actually become, once again, the Christ-bearing race?” But such advice is not really practical. Christ wants great lovers, not utilitarians. We must love Him with an overflowing heart that believeth and hopeth all things. We must become like unto the woman in the Gospels who had “an issue of blood twelve years.” She said, “If I may touch but His clothes I shall be whole.” If we could but touch His clothes, reconnecting with our white, Christian ancestors, we too will be made whole and be more than a match for the pestilence of liberalism and the savage onslaught of the Moslems and the colored barbarians.

Notes:
(1) The old home town looks the same
As I step down from the train
And there to meet me is my mama and my papa

Down the road I look and there runs Mary
Hair of gold and the lips like cherries
It’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

Yes, they’ll all come to meet me
Arms reachin’, smiling sweetly
Oh, it’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

The old house is still standing
Though the paint is cracked and dry
And there’s that old oak tree that I used to play on

Yeah, down the lane I’ll walk with my sweet Mary
Hair of gold and the lips like cherries
It’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

Yes, they’ll all come to meet me
Arms reachin’, smiling sweetly
Oh, it’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

Then I awake and look around me
At four gray walls that surround me
And I realize I was only dreamin’

There’s a guard and there’s a sad old padre
Arm and arm we’ll walk at daybreak again
I’ll touch the green, green grass of home

Yes, they’ll all come to see me
In the shade of that old tree
As I lay me in the green, green grass of home

By Burt Bacharach and Hal David
(2) What is never taken into account by liberals or conservatives is the extent to which contact with the Christian Europeans altered the behavior of the followers of the Jewish, Moslem, and Asian faiths. Their people became kinder and gentler without realizing the reason for their alterations. Now that the Europeans have repudiated the European Christianity of their ancestors the pagan faiths are resurfacing in all their naked Christ-hating fury
(3) We should not have to prove that the Syrians entering the United States and Europe are terrorists before we deny them entre, any more than we should feel compelled to let a stranger into our home simply because he has proved he is not a murderer. Our nation, like our home, should only be welcome to our kith and kin.