Mar 15, 2016

TradYouth Hour: Focus Your Power

via TradYouth

Listen Now

Matthew Heimbach returns with a new Trad Youth Hour and starts by talking a bit about the job he was recently fired from, for having the wrong political beliefs. The position he had, was one where he would have been helping abused juveniles and his politics never would have come into it, but they still saw fit to sack him. One of his supervisors just waddled over to him one day after seeing Matt on the TV and told him his politics were abhorrent and that he was not welcome there because of them. They would rather see kids be abused, than have anyone pro-White working for them.

The Mysteries of Ingwe

via Inglinga

I have several times mentioned that Ingwe/Ing could be connected to the name 'Ygg' or 'Igg' which is a by-name of Woden and the root of 'Yggdrasil' or 'Iggdrasil'. The Gothic rune for 'Ing' is Yggws which may have been pronounced 'Yngwas', and we have the Greek letters 'gg' being pronounced 'ng'. The name 'Ygg' is said to mean The Terrible One and 'Yggdrasil' is the Steed of The Terrible One. Since 'steed' infers a horse, it may be relevant to mention that the old children's word for horse is 'gee-gee' (g-g), and we may well ask where that term came from. 

We need to look at the underlying archetype of Ingwe if we are to gain further knowledge of this. I have suggested the following sequence -

Ingwe - Sceaf - Woden - Hama - 'Son of Man(nus)' - The White Krist

I would like to suggest that Ingwe is a very old name given to the same archetype as Woden. Indeed, since we find a close link between Krist (as the Hanged God) and Woden (as the Hanged God) this links both to the 'Cross' (the Sign of Ingwe is the Cross of Fro-Ing) or the Wolf-Tree. This would explain in part the obscure references to Ingwe in certain weapons -

Gungnir - 'Gift of Ing'

Mimming - 'Memory of Ing'

In some way these references to Ing/Ingwe suggest that this archetype is very ancient indeed, and his memory is all but veiled in an ancient mist. Since we can find this same archetype in the 'Celtic' names Aengus/Oengus/Angus then it is just a step further in seeing Ingwe as the God of At-al-land, the memory of which can be found within the Lore of the Frisians, and also we may surmise in the 'Celtic' Lore that has been recorded here in Britain. References to 'sunken lands' can be found this side of the North Sea too. It is also to be noted that a by-name of Rudra (Shiva) is Ugg - Rudra is a very ancient archetype that pre-dates Shiva, and this archetype is that of the Wild Hunter-God. 

When we look at the figure of Odin portrayed by many Odinists it seems to be totally different from the Wild Hunter-God or Wolf-God that has arisen as the new Woden Archetype within Folkish Wodenism. The Woden Archetype is far nearer to Rudra who is also a wild, chaotic figure, whose by-name 'Ugg' is very similar in sound and in meaning to 'Igg'. Woden rides an eight-legged steed (horse) whereas Rudra rides a Bull. What I am saying here is that this is a far more ancient concept of this archetype.

The incarnation of Ingwe as Wid-Ar - the Crowned and Conquering Son - is made clear through the events of August 1999, the Solar Eclipse, the Perseid Meteor Shower, and the Sign of Ingwe in the skies. We can see another side of this archetype when we consider the Greek Perseus to be the Archetypal Divine Hero (born of a God and a Human Woman) - he is the Archetypal Parsifal or The Divine Fool. We have now entered the Age of Ingwe or The Age of the Son, and the primary archetype of our Folk is the Warrior-Hero mounted upon a White Horse, carrying a shield bearing the White Dragon, and the Flaming Sword in his right hand. 

The White Stone of Ing is the 'Gift of Ing' which is - Fire! Fire is an element which is esoterically associated with movement and action, which (as Steed has also mentioned) is connected to the suffix -ing which is always used to denote 'movement' or 'action' and thus 'change'. As Steed suggests, this connects to Woden and the Woda-Force (which is 'movement'), but it also links to Irmin whose name may stem from ermin (at one level) meaning 'to put into motion'. We may also mention here that the name Iring, using the suffix ing suggests that Ir is 'put into motion'; when we find that Iring's Way is the Milky Way we can see that this is a coiling, swirling motion symbolised by the Swastika. Ir or Irmin is the God of the Arya. (Note that Arya stems from the Aryan Root *ar- which means 'movement' as well as 'to plough'.)

In one sense Ingwe is the Life-Force which is in constant motion and change; constantly moving, swirling and changing. This is the Virile Force (Vril) which is the Force of the Hero (Vira/Wera) connected to the Ur-Rune (note here that Rudra rides a 'bull' and this rune is that of the Ur-Ox or Primal Bull). [*] In this respect the Ing-Rune actually means 'hero'. Ingwe is the Archetypal Hero or Divine Hero

[*] A post on the Ar-Kan Rune-Lag Blog will be based upon Vril-Vira-Ur Rune ideas - coming soon.

The Symbol of Ingwe is the White Dragon or more precisely the White, Winged Coiled Serpent and this links to the name 'Iggdrasil' which can be said to mean -

Igg - Ing

Dra - Dragon

Sil - Sun

Which gives us - Sun Dragon of Ing. But, since the word 'sil' developed from 'sele' in the name 'Silbury Hill' then it is also possible to see 'sil' as selig meaning 'holy or 'blessed', thus - Holy Dragon of Ing. The Listian term sal suggests 'salvation' and again we can see here a link between Iggdrasil and 'salvation', through Lif and Lifthrasir that dwell within the trunk of the Holy Tree. Iggdrasil is the White Tree as well as the White Dragon.

The Inga-Fire is the 'Inner Fire' within all life, and it is also the Fire-Serpent or Kundalini (The Kan-Fire as on the White Stone of Ing). In Kundalini in the Physical World Mary Scott suggests that the Kundalini (which is a word connected to 'to turn' or 'to coil') is like a 'screw' (which 'coils' or 'twists') in space, which suggests the concept of the worm-holes (wyrm/worm = a dragon = 'to turn') postulated by Quantum Science. This idea also connects to the 'coils' found in dowsing ancient sites and 'ley-lines' (Heilig Lines). Since ratio was the basis of Ancient Mathematics we should note the following sequence, based upon the 3 1/2 coils of the Fire-Serpent -

3 1/2 : 7 : 14 : 28 : 56 : 112

In English Gematria the Number 112 means The Hooded Man - is this really a coincidence, or synchronicity? The Hooded Man holds within himself the 'Balance of Light and Darkness', which holds true for his Weapon of Power - the Sword Albion - and at one level the Archetypal Myth of Ragnarok is based upon the conflict and union of opposites, which forms the basis of the stage prior to the separation necessary to achieve the Resurrection of the Hero (Ingwe). 'Albion' is the ancient name for England. 

The Inga-Fire is symbolised by the Lightning-Bolt (Sig-Rune) which is the Fire of the Superman (The Coming Man). This, as we have stated, is the Vril-Force at one level.

The Lightning-Bolt is the Power of Thunor, just as the Swastika or Hammer of Thunor is the moving power of Mjollnir - 'The Crusher' or 'The Miller'. This is the power that 'grinds', the power of the World Mill, 'grinding' down in order to re-create - the Power of Destruction-to-Recreation. Thunor is the Archetypal Hero-God who the Warrior of Woden worships and emulates in order to become 'as the gods'. 

We have seen how (at one level) the prophecy in Voluspa of the coming of The Mighty One ('The Strong One From Above') relates to Hama (Heimdall) as found in the references in Voluspa which match exactly to Hama. The 'e'en Greater One', as I have stated, refers to Wid-Ar, and thus to Ingwe if what I say is correct. This archetype is that of The Terrible One and we can see this in the oft-quoted stanza attributed to Nostradamus -

"In the year 1999 and seven months, from the sky will come the great King of Terror (Solar Eclipse - Black Sun). He will bring back to life the great King of Angolmois (King of the Angles, i.e. Ingwe). Before and after Mars reigns supreme."

Ingwe will be 'brought back to life' through the King of Terror - the Black Sun or Solar Eclipse of August 11th 1999. The omen surrounding this will be the reign of the War-God (here named Mars). This has certainly shown to be true since the events afterwards have been a Reign of Terror going under the title 'War on Terror'. It was the Power of the Black Sun that brought this Ancient Archetype back to life or resurrected. This was also the conception of the Age of Ing - The Age of the Son.

As yet, the importance of Ingwe has not been recognised; he is the most ancient archetype of the English Folk, and it is the English Folk that bear the Inga-Fire and the innate Power of Ingwe. This is why the English have always been adventurers, conquerors, battle-hardy and victorious, bearing the Inner Fire (Inga-Fire) within them. What we call the 'English' of today are a pale relic of this once ancient people, but that Inga-Fire (Fire of the White Dragon) still burns within the Folk-Soul. Today it yet remains a smouldering 'ember', but an 'ember' that can be fanned into a flame through the application of the Power of Ingwe. To 'fan' an ember into a flame it is only necessary to apply wind or the movement of air - the Force of Woden. 

The Inga-Stone (White Horse Stone) has been seen as the 'Birthplace of England' and in a sense this is very true; it marks the place where Hengest and Horsa defeated the Britons and started the ascendency of the Germanic Folk here in England. Again, through Hengest and Horsa being the Divine Horse Twins we are back to the Horse Totem of Igg/Ingwe. Indeed, hidden within the name H-eng-est is the name 'Ing' or 'Eng' (Eng-lish). Hengest could be seen as the Geist of Ingwe - Spirit of Ingwe. This indicates that Hengest was the Incarnation of Ingwe which is why he is connected to the founding of the English Nation. As an ancient archetype he came as Sceaf to aid the English Tribes on the Holy Island (Scandi) at the end of the Golden Age, to bring agriculture (The Arya) and the Secret of Fire. Indeed, as well as the physical element of fire, Sceaf-Ing brought down the Inga-Fire which dwells in the Soul of the English Folk. He was resurrected as Hengest in order to counter the growing power of the Joten - Forces of Chaos - wielding the Sword of AEtla which was passed on by the Hun-Lord, Attila as the Wyrd of Attila

As we can see from the Symbol of Iggdrasil, the Horse ('Steed') and the Dragon are interchangeable symbols, so the White Horse and the White Dragon are also interchangeable. So the Symbol of Ingwe is the White Dragon or the White Horse, the latter featuring on the flag of the Old Saxons, as seen by the modern Flags of Saxony. (Here we should note that the Saxons and Engels were often seen as the same.) This is also proven by the famous Nursery Rhyme that concerns Banbury Cross -

Ride a cock-horse (coch-horse = red horse) to Banbury Cross,
To see a Fine Lady (*) upon a White Horse.

(*) The 'Fine Lady' is Lady Godiva or God-Gifa whose name contains the Gyfu-Rune which crops up throughout these ideas. She is the 'Gift-Goddess' Gefion or Freya.

When we consider that the White Stone of Ing(we) is not of the type of stone found anywhere in the area that it was found (Steyning), there could be a possibility that it has come from further north, maybe even from At-al-Land which is an interesting thought. This is perhaps made clearer by the use of the name Cuthman which stems from a very complex root -

Old English cyththu - 'knowledge'.

Old English cyth - 'known' (pp of kunnan - 'to know'.

Old English cythan - 'make known'.

Old English cyththe - 'native land', 'kindred'.

From these we get the English word 'kith' which forms the saying 'kith and kin'. We still use the term 'uncouth' which is 'un-couth' meaning originally 'one who is not known', a stranger. The letter 'y' in the above would be sounded as 'u' as in 'us'. The terms 'Kith' and 'Kin' derive from the same root, and originally in the Ken-Rune or Kin-Rune. (Note that this can be found on the White Stone of Ing, suggesting that the rune also represents the 'Known Man' - Ingwe.) The twin meanings of cyththe - 'native land' and 'kindred' must remind us of the concept of Blood (Kin) and Land (Kith). 'Kith and Kin' can thus mean 'Land and Blood' just as in German this is Blut und Boden. We see the very same mystical link between Man and his Land - this is the root-essence of the Arya. 

The idea that the White Stone of Ing may have originated in the sunken lands we know as At-al-land may well be hinted at in the use of the Ken-Rune on the White Stone of Ing. This is not the usual Ken-Rune of either the Common Germanic Futhark nor the Old English Futhork, but a variant which can be found in the English Runes and which seems to represent a Fire with smoke arising from it. 

It seems reasonable to assume that the English Tribes would have known full well who Ing/Ingwe was - their Divine Ancestor. The White Stone of Ing would have been left to us as a 'key' to discovering the Mystery of Ingwe when the time was right - i.e. at the End of Time. The Gift of Ing is the DNA Code which to us contains the Blood Memory. The blood, to us, is not just a physical element that courses around the body, it is the vehicle of the 'spirit' (just as oxygen is taken around the body through the blood). In this way we can see the Blood as the Igneous Blood (note the word igneous related to Agni) which is the Fire of the Black Sun. We have here a direct link between Ingwe and the Black Sun, as in the Prophesies of Nostradamus. The Black Sun is the power that awakens Ingwe and we can also find this once again in The Prophecy 88 where it is the power of the Black Sun of the Inner Earth that melts the ice that imprisons the Goddess of the New Dawn - Idunn. It is the Dawn-Goddess that brings into being the Divine Child - the Last Avatar. 

Is it any wonder then that our enemies fear the power of the Black Sun; but they also fear the power of Ingwe symbolised by the White Dragon. This explains, even if done unconsciously, the attacks upon the English Awakening which was symbolised by the growing use of the White Dragon. It also explains the return to a 'British Consciousness' that has followed - this symbolism being the Red Dragon. The symbol of the White Dragon was already being distorted at this time, but their actions have assured that it is now being taken up by the more Folkish elements, which means it is rising once more but this time in the right way. 

As found in Revelation the White Stone is symbolic of Ingwe (Ing) and tells us that Ingwe is the 'new name of God', i.e. the new archetype for this new world age. Since it seems likely that Wid-Ar is a god-force (archetype) that 'resurrects' every 26,000 years (a Great Year) then we can assume that this also applies to Ingwe. This cycle is made up of four periods of around 6,500 years which is a time not very far off that linked to the cycle of the Hale-Bopp Comet and the sinking of At-al-land around 7,000 years ago. Again, we are back to the idea that Ingwe was the God of At-al-land, and that there is no doubt that he led his people out of the sinking lands to safety - 'Eastwards across the waves' maybe. This would have led this remnant out of the area to Scandinavia and Northern Germany, the later 'homeland' of the English Tribes. Some of the peoples would have remained here, no doubt, and the later 'invasions' were merely a return to their original Homeland or 'Racial Lands'. 

If I am right here then the Legend of Ingwe is very ancient and has still been remembered in the English Rune-Row under the rune called 'Ing'. The English version of the Ing-Rune (shown below) is in fact the Germanic Ing-Rune with a downward-pointing arrow (Sinking of At-al-land/Ingwe) and an upward-pointing arrow (Rising of At-al-land/Ingwe) combined into one symbol -

The rune is also a glyph of the Edel-Rune shown downwards (Sinking of At-al-land) and upwards (Rising of At-al-land) which again combines the very same idea, but this time using the Rune of At-al-land itself. Combined in this one rune is the concept of Blood (Ing) and Land (Edel). Also, hidden within the Rune of Ing are the Twin Kan-Runes of the Inga-Fire (Kan-Fusion) and, when the rune is turned around, the Twin Ur-Runes of the Vril-Force (Ur-Fusion). In both cases we see a 'Union of Opposites', the Ken-Runes representing Male-Female (penetrating-receiving) and the Ur-Runes also representing Male-Female (the same but seen as upward-downward/heaven-earth). Ingwe thus represents the Union of Opposites (Ragnarok) which separate creating the God-Man or the Resurrection of the Hero. The separation is represented by the downward arrow and the upward arrow separated by the Sign of Ing (Germanic Ing-Rune which is here the 'Seed of Creation'). 

It is again relevant to note that in the twisted and distorted Merlin TV Series the sign attributed to the High Priestess of the Old Religion who dwelt upon the Isle of the Blest was the Old English Ing-Rune with a 'seed' (dot) in the centre, in this case using the Ur-Fusion version (the above rune turned around). The High Priestess was named Nimwe if I recall rightly. It is made clear here, taken from Celtic Lore that holds these mysteries, that the Isle of the Blest was the last stronghold of the 'Old Religion' which in the series was represented by the White Dragon. It may be, as I have said before, that the Isle of the Blest were the last to sink into the North Sea - and maybe the first to rise again from the Waters of Chaos. If Nimwe represents the White Dragon (seen with Morgana, another Priestess of the Old Religion) then the Isle of the Blest would be the last stronghold of the Cult of Ingwe. 

Here we should recall the alternative symbolism contained in the Edel-Rune - the Balance of the Power of Light and the Power of Darkness. This is twin Sig-Runes facing each other. This is the Rune of The Hooded Man as mentioned by Hamasson. We only need to 'crown' the above Edel-Rune to create the Ing-Rune and thus the Crowned and Conquering Son. The Edel-Rune represents the sunken lands of At-al-land but it also represents the 'key' to understanding the Mysteries of Ingwe, since adding the 'crown' represents Ingwe, which suggests the link between Sacral Kingship and the Land (Sovereignty). We can see this when we use the Ing-Rune as the Rune of Kingship and the Edel-Rune in its alternative version - Erda - as the Rune of the Earth Mother. This is the Sacred Marriage of the Sacral King to the Land (Sovereignty). 

This photo shows the Sun-Symbol at Banbury Cross, and in another post I saw this as maybe being the Black Sun as well as the White Sun (White Horse/White Dragon) and the idea that it is the Power of the Black Sun that awakens Ingwe suggests that this may be a valid idea. The idea that Banbury (Beran-byrig) links to the Sacred Centre of England, and that this is the centre of the House of the Wolsungas (Barnstock Oak/Branstock Oak) also links it to the World Tree - Iggdrasil - and thus to Ingwe. Indeed, Bran, Ban etc. are names of the Celtic figure who is beheaded and whose head then guards the Land of England. It was said to have been buried in the Tower of London. Bran is associated with the Raven, and the last ravens that are in the Tower of London are Huginn and Muninn - the Ravens of Woden. The solar-symbol here actually suggests the 'centre' since the Sun is the centre of our solar system. 

Ingwe is the Inner Fire that burns in the heart of the Inga-Folk, and in the core of every star - the Life-Force - everywhere the centre whose circumference is nowhere. Ingwe is the Fire-Snake, the Secret Serpent which is coiled, waiting to spring (spr-ing) into action. Ingwe is an Ancient God, a Primal Force, the 'Terrible One' later known as Woden, also known as Rudra, tamed to Shiva, but still the 'Wild One', the 'One-Eyed Hunter-God' whose symbolism is that of a Dark God standing upon his Left Leg, holding his Left Arm behind his back, and peering through his Left Eye in the Crane-Stance which is the Magical Gesture of the One-Eyed Hunter-God, the Wild Man of the Woods, the Lord of the Trees, the Lord of the Animals - the Wolf-God. His awakening is symbolised by the Wer-wolf (werewolf) which like the god Wid-Ar suggests the God of Resistance - the resistance to this vile regime that oppresses our Folk and seeks our final destruction. Ingwe, Wid-Ar, HelgiH, The Hooded Man - these are all forms of the same Archetypal Hero who appears in order to resist an oppressive regime and to lead the English Folk to the Final Victory.

Roche Motel Revisited: The Comfort of an Atomized Society

via The Occidental Observer

“Trust me – I’m an economist”: Jonathan Portes
There is no Nobel Prize for Mathematics, which is ridiculous. But there is a Nobel Prize for Economics, which is risible. Mathematics is to economics rather as astronomy is to astrology. True, economics isn’t a pseudo-science, but it still offers plenty of room to charlatans and phonies. Exhibit A: the “charmless, pompous and mediocre” Jonathan Portes, a Jewish economist who dedicates his life to telling British Whites that only mass immigration can save their nation from economic collapse.

 Portes, who still regularly appears at the Guardian and BBC, was central to New Labour’s successful plan to flood the country with cheap labour and left-wing voters while concealing what they were up to from their traditional supporters. But he has a devastating response to those who allege that New Labour plotted in secret to open the borders: he calls this a “conspiracy theory.”

Traitors at the top

What more need be said? On Planet Portes, that is the end of the matter. So it was a waste of time for the Daily Mail to serialize a new biography of Tony Blair that sets out in great detail how the conspiracy took place. Tom Bower, the book’s author, conducted “interviews with more than 200 senior civil servants, ex-ministers and other insiders.” He gathered abundant proof that Blair “did not want the public to know his true plans on immigration” and that Blair “ordered his Labour government never to discuss in public the supposed ‘advantages’ of the unprecedented influx.”
Why did he bother with all that? Does he not realize that he is peddling a conspiracy theory? But this isn’t the first time that the Daily Mail has brazenly published the truth about what Portes and his fellow conspirators got up to:
Labour let in 2.2million migrants during its 13 years in power – more than twice the population of Birmingham. Lord Glasman, 49, had already told BBC Radio 4 recently [in 2011]: ‘What you have with immigration is the idea that people should travel all over the world in search of higher-paying jobs, often to undercut existing workforces, and somehow in the Labour Party we got into a position that that was a good thing. Now obviously it undermines solidarity, it undermines relationships, and in the scale that it’s been going on in England, it can undermine the possibility of politics entirely.’
The academic, who directs the faith and citizenship programme at London Metropolitan University, criticised Labour for being ‘hostile to the English working class’. He said: ‘In many ways [Labour] viewed working-class voters as an obstacle to progress. Their commitment to various civil rights, anti-racism, meant that often working-class voters … were seen as racist, resistant to change, homophobic and generally reactionary. So in many ways you had a terrible situation where a Labour government was hostile to the English working class.’ (Miliband ally attacks Labour migration ‘lies’ over 2.2m they let in Britain, The Daily Mail, 16th April 2011)

Quiet Conspiracy

Note that Lord Glasman is Jewish. It is not true that all British Jews are hostile to the White majority or enthusiastic supporters of mass immigration. Unfortunately, it was the anti-White, pro-immigration Jews in New Labour who controlled policy. Jonathan Portes is one example. Barbara Roche is another. I wrote about her in “We Hate UKIP: Turning Britain into a Roche Motel.” Now she’s turned up in Tom Bower’s book:
Sinister Minister: Barbara Roche
Sinister Minister: Barbara Roche
The most incredible revelations [about New Labour’s conspiracy] concern Barbara Roche, a little-known MP who was immigration minister between 1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies – with Mr Blair’s approval – that changed the face of the UK. … Like [Jack] Straw, Blair was careful never publicly to mention the rising number of immigrants from India and Pakistan who could now enter Britain. Nor did he consider how to provide housing, schools and healthcare for an additional 300,000 people arriving a year.
Least of all did either of them question whether the immigrants would have any effect on the lives of the British working class. (Nine years later, a report by the Migration Advisory Committee found that 23 British workers had been displaced for every 100 foreign-born workers employed here.)
Could this chicanery get any worse? It did — with the appointment of Barbara Roche as Junior Immigration Minister. Blair’s only instruction to her was to deport bogus asylum seekers. But Roche wasn’t playing. In her first conversation with a senior immigration official, she was candid: ‘I think asylum seekers should be allowed to stay. Removal takes too long, and it’s emotional.’ Even the word ‘bogus,’ she maintained, created a negative feeling.
‘It was clear Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain,’ recalled Stephen Boys-Smith, the new head of the immigration directorate. ‘She didn’t see her job as controlling entry, but by looking at the wider picture “in a holistic way” she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.’ Jack Straw never openly contradicted Roche — it simply wasn’t worth the risk of alienating the Labour Party. So she set to work on a speech, in which she outlined the advantages of reducing controls to immigration and portrayed asylum seekers as skilled labour. She didn’t discuss what she was going to say with Straw. …
‘Well done, Barbara,’ Blair told Roche soon [after the speech]. Despite its controversial content, her speech passed relatively unnoticed. But migrants quickly grasped its importance and passed the news on to their friends and family across the world. Labour was letting more people in, they told them, and — unlike other European countries — Britain would provide benefits and state housing. …
One of Roche’s legacies was hundreds more migrants camped in squalor in Sangatte, outside Calais, where they tried to smuggle themselves onto lorries. News about the new liberalism — and in particular the welfare benefits — now began attracting Somalis who’d previously settled in other EU countries. Although there was no historic or cultural link between Somalia and Britain, more than 200,000 came. Since most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare, the Home Office could have refused them entry. But they were granted ‘exceptional leave to remain’. [Et cetera ad nauseam] (Conman Blair’s cynical conspiracy to deceive the British people and let in 2million migrants against the rules, The Daily Mail, 26th February 2016)
Barbara Roche is obviously hostile to Britain’s White majority, so it’s interesting to ask how she got the post of immigration minister. Will Israel ever appoint an anti-Semitic goy to control their immigration policies? No, that’s impossible. Israel is a Jewish state and determined to remain so. But it’s evil and hateful for a White Christian nation like Britain to retain its ethnic and religious identity.

Combating anti-semitism and xenophobia

That’s why a Jew like Barbara Roche was an ideal person to oversee immigration here. Like Jonathan Portes and Moshe Kantor, she isn’t anywhere near as famous as she should be. But it isn’t difficult to find out what motivated her while she was immigration minister. She was educated at the Orthodox Jewish JFS in London, which was once called the Jews’ Free School and was the largest Jewish school in Europe. In 2001, a Guardian interview said that her “parents were part Spanish, Portuguese, Polish and Russian, and she had entered politics – she still emphasises this today – to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.”

Ten years later, the Black journalist Hugh Muir interviewed her again in the Guardian. Unlike Portes, Muir was prepared to consider the possibility of a New Labour conspiracy to open the borders. But how to test that possibility? Simple: you just ask Barbara Roche, who must have “been up to her neck in it,” if there actually was one. It’s well-known that conspirators always admit the conspiracy if you ask them. Well, Hugh asked Barbara and she shook her head emphatically: definitely not, “there wasn’t” a conspiracy.

Abolishing Britain

What more need be said? On Planet Muir, that is the end of the matter. But Roche was happy to reveal her true feelings about “diversity”:
Friday rush hour. Euston station [in London]. Who’s here? Who isn’t. A kaleidoscope of skin colours. The world in one terminus. Barbara Roche can see it over the rim of her cup of Americano coffee. “I love the diversity of London,” she tells me. “I just feel comfortable.” (Hideously Diverse Britain: The immigration ‘conspiracy’, The Guardian, 2nd March 2011)
Why does Barbara Roche “love” an atomized society? Why does she feel “comfortable” there? I’d suggest that it’s because she doesn’t stand out as a minority and so doesn’t feel paranoid. In the stale pale Britain of the past, there were periodic outbreaks of inexplicable and irrational anti-Semitism, from the expulsion of Jews by Edward I in 1290 to the “pogrom” that swept the Welsh valleys in 1911.

Barbara Roche obviously feels that such uncomfortable events are much less likely in an atomized Britain. As the late Larry Auster put it in an American context: “it is not surprising that these Jews look at mass Third-World and Moslem immigration, not as a danger to themselves, but as the ultimate guarantor of their own safety, hoping that in a racially diversified, de-Christianized America, the waning majority culture will lack the power, even if it still has the desire, to persecute Jews.”

Minority Mandate

Britain is supposed to be a democracy, or a nation under majority control. It isn’t: like the United States, it’s an oligarchy, or a nation under minority control. The minority in question is Jewish. There has never been a democratic mandate for mass immigration, but the wishes of the White majority didn’t matter. Instead, the oligarchic mandate of Jews like Jonathan Portes and Barbara Roche opened Britain’s borders to terrorists, rapists and fraudsters from the Third World, and will eventually make Britain’s native peoples into a minority in a land they have settled since the Ice Ages.

Britain has been been turned into a Roche motel because Jews feel more comfortable in an atomized society. It’s as simple as that. After all, if mass immigration goes wrong for Jews, Jonathan and Barbara can always seek refuge in Israel, which keeps its borders firmly closed to Third-World enrichment and doesn’t let hostile outsiders take control of its politics, media and universities.

But the prospect of their departure raises a disturbing question. Would Britain survive the loss of its most altruistic ethnic minority? Well, we didn’t do too badly after Edward I expelled Jews en masse in 1290. I suspect we could manage again if the worst happens and Barbara has to pack her bags for Tel Aviv.

Divorcing the Conservative Movement

via The Right Stuff

Listen, movement conservatives, it's too late. You're like the lazy, lying, adulterous wife that has maxed out the credit card at Sak's for the last time. And now you're begging for another chance. You'll do anything. Yes, even that.

But it doesn't work. See, article after article about how Trump's a con man or whatever actually reinforces the point. Sort of like when your lying, cheating, whore of a wife says she'll do that to keep you. It just reminds you of what a whore she is and why it is absolutely time to file for divorce.

In the wake of organized American Marxism's successful disruption of a Trump Rally in Chicago, many of you are cucking harder than you've ever cucked, blaming Trump's tone, calling him a hypocrite, or whatever. And with every article and every tweet, you remind us of why we've left you:

In a fight, you choose the left over the right.

Democrats don't do this. When the liberal base gets rowdy (e.g. when dindus start nuffining whole city blocks to the ground), the Democrat pundits and politicians pivot to attack the right. Blame racism. Blame the police. Blame capitalism. Whatever. They never, ever punch left. But when the left literally organizes and buses in thugs to physically attack the right? What do we get? We get this:

The reason you movement conservatives are unable to push your guy, Ted Cruz, through the nomination is you're currently batting 0.00 against the left. You won't fight. You've never fought. One doesn't have to be a white nationalist or an Esoteric Hitlerist LARP-Righter to see that when the left attacks, our self-appointed guardians in the GOP and the conservative punditocracy fold. You care more about being dignified than anything, and since the left fights dirty, you lose. Over. And over. And over. But hey, at least you get to go on MSNBC once in a while to get made fun of.

Literally the only time the conservative movement is willing to fight dirty is to crush someone who's a little too far to the right and too appealing to the base, like Ron Paul or Pat Buchanan. Then your boy gets in, the general gets going, and the gloves get put back on. And you lose (remember, you only won in 2000 because Nader ran as a spoiler).

At this point, it's too late. The American voters the Republicans have traditionally relied on want a divorce. They're tired of losing. They want someone who fights. It actually doesn't matter if Trump just wants to paint a giant golden T on the White House. The fact is that he intends to win, and conservatives don't. He doesn't attack his base, and conservatives do. Conservatism, Inc. still hasn't figured out that Trump's primary support is coming from Republicans, and calling them stupid racists who embarrass the party is just sealing your fate.

I've been politically active for over 15 years now, and I've seen up close how the conservatives' favored tactic of being nice to people who hate you, writing white papers nobody reads, and insisting we play by the rules as leftists cheat their way to the top has failed. In politics, literally nothing matters if you don't win, and since conservatives don't win, conservatives don't matter.

If the wife didn't want a divorce, she shouldn't have slept with someone else. If the conservative movement wanted to matter, you should have fought. You should have used every trick in the book to shut down leftist agitprop groups, to destroy the reputations of left-wing journalists, to purge leftists from school administration, and to block Democrats from putting actual Marxists on the Supreme Court. Instead, you defended Hollywood tax breaks on some kind of "free market principle" while the studios made movies normalizing homosexuality, so now Hollywood still has its tax breaks and sodomy cake is a legal right.

If conservatives had some proven ability to win, we wouldn't be talking about Trump, because you'd be too busy winning for him to get an opening. The border would be secure, owning a Che shirt would ruin your employment prospects, and busing in protestors to shut down a Republican candidate's event would result in RICO prosecutions.

But that's not how it is. And because that's not how it is, the conservative movement is dead. Everything you can do at this point only reminds us of why we're leaving you. And by "we," I don't just mean edgy internet racists. I mean everyone who's done with Conservatism, Inc. You have literally nothing to offer, and all your angry tears just underscore that fact.

This relationship is over. All you can do now is cry about it.

Evangelical Churchianity

via Radio Aryan

Listen Now

Sven Longshanks and Grandpa Lampshade take a look at one of the worst forms of Judaeo-Christianity. These misguided folks believe everything their preachers tell them without thinking to go check for themselves. They take verses from the Bible and then build entire doctrines out of them, without any thought for the context in which they were written or what the rest of scripture says about it. Evangelical Christianity is one of the most Judophilic types of the modern day cults that call themselves Christian.

 Much of the corruption in the church can be traced to the Jews, in the same way that Eve taught destruction to Adam, the Jews teach destruction to us. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that God loves everyone, it tell us not to seek the other races peace but to have nothing to do with them. If we had obeyed this commandment we would not be in the mess we are today, as we never would have shared any of our science and technology with the other races.

 Turning the other cheek, loving your enemies, Abrahamic faiths, it is all deconstructed here along with the idea that everyone just needs to repent to become Christian. What was the point of Christ’s parable of the devil sowing weeds in among the wheat, if the weeds can repent? The Jews are the weeds and they just cant help proving this, with their constant calls for the invasion of our nations by even more weeds to choke the life out of us.

 Thankfully there is no danger of us losing the route back to a genuine Christianity, as we still have the oldest scriptures to refer to. The more the Jews subvert the faith, the more people leave the churches in droves, looking for the truth elsewhere. We must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater though, we dont call for government, education, television or movies to be discontinued because of Jewish corruption of them and the same logic should be applied to Christianity. It belongs to the White Europeans and should have stayed with White Europeans, there are no epistles to the Congoids or gospel of Nbongo and we were instructed not to cast our pearls before the dogs and the swine lest they turn around and attack us.

German Elections: Disaster for Mad Merkel as Patriotic AfD Party Makes Huge Gains

via Britannia

Frauke Petry - leader of the AfD
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling conservatives have suffered humiliating losses to the anti-immigrant Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party in three key state elections seen as a referendum on her “open door” refugee policy which allowed more than a million migrants to enter the country last year.

The real shock of Sunday night's polling was the scale of AfD’s gains, which easily entered all three legislatures.

The three-year-old party (AfD) - which has campaigned against Mrs Merkel's open-borders approach - won 15.1% of the vote in Baden-Wuerttemberg, official results showed. 

It scored about 12.5% in Rhineland-Palatinate and 24% in Saxony-Anhalt, where it finished second, according to projections by ARD and ZDF television with most districts counted.

At AfD headquarters in Berlin where the results were being monitored last night the atmosphere was described as “ ecstatic”. A jubilant Frauke Petry, the party leader declared on television: “We are now a party for the whole of Germany.” Alexander Gauland, another leading AfD figure said: “Ms Merkel’s refugee policy has lost her party votes – we, by contrast, have made it clear from the start that we don’t want to take them in.” 

Ms. Merkel was not immediately available for comment. However initial opinion survey results showed that a large percentage of AfD votes came from disgruntled former supporters of her ruling Christian Democrats’ Union (CDU). In Saxony Anhalt alone, 76 per cent of the electorate thought that the main parties were “not taking their concerns about refugees seriously”, a German TV poll found last night.

The Chancellor’s CDU was nevertheless expected to hang on to power in Saxony Anhalt as the largest party, in coalition with Social Democrats and Greens. In Baden Württemberg, Ms Merkel’s party was humiliated by the ruling Green party, which won 32 per cent of the vote – its best result ever. Her party was expected to become a junior coalition partner in the state government under the leadership of the Greens. 

In Rhineland Palatinate Julia Klöckner, the CDU’s state leader and Ms Merkel’s favourite, failed to oust Malu Dreyer, the state’s current Social Democrat prime minister who was expected to form a governing coalition with other parties.

The result will increase discontent within Ms Merkel’s party and prompt renewed calls for a change of course on refugee policy. However it was thought unlikely to pose any immediate threat to her position as Chancellor as her refugee policies continue to enjoy the support of  many conservatives as well as Social Democrats and Greens.

But the result marked a significant and, to many Germans, disturbing victory for the AfD. Like its next-door neighbour and closest European ally, France, Germany is now saddled with a vehemently anti-immigration, right-wing nationalist party whose presence has already sharpened political debate and contributed to the spread of racially motivated, anti-migrant violence.

Less than three years since its founding, the party which says it wants to put the Fatherland back in Germany now holds parliamentary seats in eight of Germany’s 16 federal states. In two other state elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Pomerania this autumn, the party is also almost certain to enter both parliaments. It also has good chances of winning seats in Germany’s most populous state of North Rhine Westfalia in 2017 elections there.

With a full German general election in the autumn next year, the AfD at the moment would seem well placed to enter Berlin’s national Bundestag parliament by the end of 2017. All other parties have ruled out the idea of a coalition with the AfD, so the arithmetic of Teutonic politics dictates that for the foreseeable future Germany may be run by a succession of grand coalition governments made up of its two main parties.

Angela Merkel claims that she is on the way to solving Europe’s worst refugee crisis since the Second World War. Much depends on whether she can broker a convincing deal with Turkey and her European allies later this week.

By the end of next year, after federal elections, Ms Merkel may still be in the saddle as Germany’s first woman Chancellor and leading her third consecutive grand coalition government. But her hitherto unblemished record may be stained. AfD seems certain to repeat its local success in a general election - in which case Ms Merkel’s critics will see her as the German leader who paved the way for a racist and nationalist party to gain a toehold in the national parliament for the first time since 1945.

From Con to Consciousness

via Radix

It’s a long way from Amarillo to Washington.

Kevin Williamson knows the road well, going from the heartland to the heart of darkness in the BosWash corridor is practically a rite of passage for any aspiring “serious” voice. From its inception, the Conservative “movement” has taken its cues from the “smart set” if only at five-year belated intervals. They long to become People Who Matter™ and see their byline in the New York Times the way 60’s rock bands coveted a Rolling Stone cover.

In his latest screed “Father-Führer”, Williamson shows exactly what Conservatism Inc. is, and why it will continue to fail. Williamson begins by mocking, what he terms as, the alt-right’s notion of what Mencius Moldbug referred to as “the Cathedral”. The Cathedral is of course just another name for the managerial elite consensus that drives our so-called “elites” and its organs, which exercise narrative hegemony in our society.

Williamson, I’m sure, likes to view himself as a member of this set. Having an “opinion that matters”, and being a “voice of reason” on the right. Getting attaboys and links from the Washington Post to the New York Times, he must go to bed satisfied that his voice has been heard and that it matters.

The truth is, Williamson and others like him over at Conservatism Inc. are just part of the Synagogue of sanctimoniousness that acts as, dare I say, the trumped up hall-monitors of the right.

Always on the lookout for heresy, it fell to Williamson to denounce (the rather moderate) Michael Brendan Dougherty for insufficient fealty to the shibboleths of Irving Kristol and William F. Buckley’s reanimated corpses. Williamson wants his readers to re-think Dougherty’s defense of the white middle class that has been hammered in this country since well before this author has been born.

In doing so, Williamson is just reversing the “othering” he says the alt-right and Dougherty are doing to our managerial elites. By doing this, he reveals the way conservative movement luminaries really think about middle America. To Conservatism Inc. the large space between America’s coasts exists only as a vast fundraising farm of small business owners, frightened bigots, and belligerent babbitts who don’t know their place.

These are the people Sam Francis once called Middle American Revolutionaries(MARs). The group he hoped would rise up in revolt against elite consensus and dismantle the globalist power structures destroying the nation-state. When Francis was writing in the 90s it seemed like that might happen, Pat Buchanan rode that wave in 1996, but ultimately came up too short.

Francis argued, correctly, that Buchanan’s weakness was that he could not bring himself to divorce from “conservatism”. Enter Trump, who has broken out of the box of orthodox movement conservatism and has embraced a type of full-throated civic nationalism that is undermining all of the delicate smoke and mirrors they have set up over the years to keep the MARs from understanding their own dispossession.

But what is today’s message from MARs?

The majority of them have rallied behind Donald Trump’s slogan to “Make America Great Again”. His slogan captures many of the real anxieties they face. Especially for older and middle-aged White Americans, there is a great confusion as to what happened to “their” country. They have memories of a different time, a time when they and their children huddled before a television set to watch Neil Armstrong land on the moon and literally set the sky as the limit. Nostalgia, as it's said, is potent. Trump taps into this.

But for the young especially for my generation, millennials, there is no great past we remember. Only every year seeming to grow more and more bleak. All many have to hold onto is the thrill they had winning on an SNES as children when now they can no longer win in their lives.

Williamson did point out something that was true. The rising dependency rates on drugs and other addictions that are plaguing White America, especially among the MARs. When coupled with a declining population and increasing economic unease, the dream of a massive counter-revolution from MARs, in Francis’ original view looks more unlikely.

Of course, where Williamson shamefully errs is in asserting that all of this social anomie just appeared, as if by fiat:
Nothing happened to them. There wasn’t some awful disaster. There wasn’t a war or a famine or a plague or a foreign occupation. Even the economic changes of the past few decades do very little to explain the dysfunction and negligence—and the incomprehensible malice—of poor white America.
This is a lie.

White America has been dispossessed economically and culturally since at least the middle of last century. From the Immigration Act of 1965 to today’s Hollywood, there has never been an easier target than White America, especially working class White America. Williamson says that these communities “deserve to die”.

Can you imagine if a “conservative” pundit dare say something like “Detroit deserves to die” or something similar? The outrage and calls for resignation would be heard within the hour. But going after White Americans is just fine, especially when you need to virtue signal just how much of a part of the in-crowd you really are.

Back to the message from MARs. Today what we are seeing are calls to “Make America Great Again”, but will that be enough to cure what is really ailing White America? Sadly, the answer is no. The civic nationalism of today must give way to the ethnonationalism of tomorrow.

Williamson wants us to believe that American “conservatism” and by extension America itself is made up of abstract ideas, not the nasty Blut und Boden of European nationalism. He claims that we ask of economics to do what it never can, to define human wants in his words.

But, as Sam Francis pointed out, economics, coming from the Greek οἰκονομία means roughly “household management”. A household is based on those two very real things, the blood of its family members and the soil of the house stands on. As a people, we have either forgotten or have been brainwashed into forgetting that.

The conservative movement today is just a pathetic marketing scam, that allows for practice trials for future Daily Beast reporters and rousing up the heartland for the Israel Lobby’s latest folly. We don’t need to conserve anything, we need to remember who we are and what we can be.

White America must divorce itself from conservatism and marry itself to White consciousness if it wants to survive.

Invoking 'Holocaust,' Jew Argues Liberals Must Confront Trump & Supporters

via The Realist Report

This protester rushed the podium at a Trump
rally in Chicago in an act of “self-defense"
The organized Jewish community and the liberal, leftist establishment have been attacking and denouncing Donald Trump for months now. As of late, their overwrought, childish attempts to demonize and discredit Trump and his millions of supporters have become more and more obvious and truly pathetic.

In recent weeks, we’ve seen the Jewish controlled mass media and organized Jewish community attempt to tie Donald Trump to Dr. David Duke and the Klan in an effort to discredit the leading GOP contender, with the Anti-Defamation League demanding Trump “distance” himself from “White supremacists”. Abe Foxman, the former head of the ADL, and other “Holocaust survivors” recently expressed their outrage and horror at Trump’s alleged “Nazi-style fascist salute” at a recent rally in Florida. (Trump simply asked his supporters to raise their right hands and pledge to vote for him, and the Jews are claiming he is bringing back the Third Reich!)

The anti-White producers of Saturday Night Live just made a skit equating Trump supporters to Nazis, White supremacists, bigots and Klansmen.

Watch the video below:

The Jewish Daily Forward published yet another example of the hysterical, unhinged reaction anti-White Jewish Marxists are having to Donald Trump and his presidential candidacy. Invoking the fake “Holocaust” narrative and the Jews’ mantra of “Never again!,” Ari Paul argues that liberals must take a cue from the radical, anti-American protesters who have become increasingly more and more disruptive at recent Trump rallies (see what happened in Chicago, for example), and continue to confront Trump and his supporters – physically if necessary.
On social media and over drinks, American liberals are discussing — sometimes jokingly and sometimes not — how to move to Canada if Donald Trump makes it into the White House. Between the violence against minorities at Trump rallies, the Nazi-like salutes and the candidate’s choice to tweet a quotation from Benito Mussolini, the idea that “it can’t happen here” is quickly giving way to the fear that it just might. But what the brave activists in Chicago have shown us is that our response to Trump’s barbarity should be not a massive evacuation, but a massive confrontation.
After hundreds of activists showed up to demonstrate against Trump at his March 11 Chicago rally, the event was abruptly cancelled. Since then, Trump’s defenders and a great many moderate liberals have been painting the activists as hypocrites, partisans who talk of free speech but silence others when they don’t like what they hear. But this is farcical. Trump gets more media attention than any other candidate. And although the First Amendment enjoins the state from silencing you or your group, it doesn’t protect you from unfriendly people who don’t like what you have to say.
Besides, it’s not like the activists are trying to stamp out just extreme speech. The Trump movement has already proven that it’s ready to use physical violence to enact its code of white nationalism. In no uncertain terms, the black, Muslim and Latino activists who are putting their bodies on the line in places like Chicago are acting in self-defense. […]
Could the delusion, hysteria, and viciousness on display here be any more obvious? Jews and radical anti-White leftists truly hate Donald Trump and his supporters.

We are seeing a dangerous precedent being set. The idea that radical extremists confronting and verbally assaulting individuals at a private event in an effort to disrupt it represents a legitimate exercise of the First Amendment is absolutely absurd. The protesters in Chicago are responsible for shutting down free speech and freedom of assembly – specifically guaranteed by the First Amendment – not exercising these rights.

I wonder what liberals and Jews would think if White nationalists showed up at a Bernie Sanders rally or, say, an AIPAC conference and disrupted it, intimidating and confronting attendees? Would they be defending the actions of the protesters as legitimate expressions of the First Amendment? I doubt it.

The anti-Trump crowd is constantly attempting to portray Trump as encouraging or endorsing violent. How exactly has the Trump movement demonstrated “it’s ready to use physical violence to enact its code of white nationalism,” as the author argues? Trump is not even a White nationalist! Even more incredibly, the radical, anti-American protesters who disrupted the Trump rally in Chicago were acting in self-defense, according to Paul! How much more delusional can these people be?

Trump protester 2
A protester in Chicago legitimately exercises his First Amendment right at a Trump rally by shouting at attendees and ripping up Trump signs

Paul continues:
Jews always say in response to the Holocaust, “Never again.” Well, this activism is the living embodiment of that slogan. And if we liberals really believe in those two words, we should quit joking about moving to Canada and put our bodies on the line to protest Trump, too.
Trump has gone on the offensive against Bernie Sanders supporters, saying that the “communist” candidate has joined with angry racial minorities in forming a disruptive counter protest. It all sounds harsh, brash and hyperbolic, but there’s almost a refreshing honesty to it. Sanders may not be a communist — he’s a social democrat and a former kibbutznik, meaning that he actually believes in democratic freedom — but Trump is absolutely right that those who follow Sanders ideologically are predisposed to fighting Trump’s rhetoric in the streets as well as in the voting booths. Socialists of all varieties throughout history have fought and died to crush fascism, from the brigades of the Spanish civil war to resistance in Germany to the defense of Greece from the Nazis.
And those people who are on the receiving end of Trump’s racial incitement can’t wait until November to silently defend themselves.
This needs to be said plainly: Trump’s political ideology can only be defined as fascistic, and any other view is simply pedantic denialism. But it’s not his administration we should immediately fear. […]
What’s more troubling is that he’s brought angry, violent white nationalists out of the shadows. His rallies have become violent mobs directed at the mere presence of non-whites and Muslims. His popularity has emboldened organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and the online community Stormfront. While Trump’s presidency would be a comedic circus ending in Washington gridlock, he would give confidence to the most dangerous elements of American society. Trump might not organize Brown Shirts, but don’t be surprised if you see towns and schools districts become more overt and aggressive with their bigotry.
As scary as that sounds, it’s also the reason those of us who are seriously pondering fleeing should reconsider. […]
Watching Trump’s capitulation in Chicago, it’s clear that we need to keep the heat on him with our actions. It might be the only thing that can stop him.
These people will get violent folks. They are openly saying as much. They will do everything in their power to shut down The Donald. I admire their fighting spirit, but rest assured: that ain’t happening.

America is becoming more and more polarized with Trump’s candidacy, and it’s becoming more and more clear: you either support Donald Trump and want to ‪#‎MakeAmericaGreatAgain‬, or you’re with the hysterical, violent anti-American Commie terrorists attacking Trump supporters and disrupting his rallies.

I don’t know about you, but I know which side I’m on. #VoteTrump